טראמפ אימיגראציע פאלעסי
די אחראים: יאנאש,אחראי,געלעגער
-
Think and Thank
- שר חמשת אלפים
- תגובות: 5679
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: דינסטאג יאנואר 09, 2018 11:08 pm
וואס מאכט אייך טראכטן אז ער האט נישט אראפגעברענגט די נאמבערס?
אלעס וואס איך שרייב צו פארענטפערן די מדינה איז נאר אלס פאליטיק, כאילו ס'וואלט געווען א גוי'אישע לאנד. למעשה טאר די מדינה נישט עקזיסטירן קיין רגע און דעריבער וועט קיין שום העברת פי ה' נישט מצליח זיין. די אייציגסטע וועג ארויס איז גענצליך אויפגעבן די מדינה.
Think and Thank האט געשריבן:וואס מאכט אייך טראכטן ?
עדיטערס נאוט: שמאטע איז דער האוסט פונעם בצל כוואפאפעיכו שאו. די אויסגעקוועטשטע אפיניען איז זיין אייגענע.
יואל שרייבער האט געשריבן:איך פארשטיי נישט ווער עס האט אים נישט געלאזט היטן די בארדערס אן א וואנט? קען מען טאקע נישט טרעפן אנדערע וועגן אראפצוברענגען כאטש אביסל די נאמבערס?
מ'דארף האבן אן א שיעור מעען פאוער דערפאר. און מיט דעם אלעם זענען מענטשן נאר מענטשן (און צומאל דאס אויס נישט. קרעדיט רמ"ד קאהן\איינער פון אונזערע ניקס דא אויפן וועלטל) און קענען נישט אייביג, אלעס באווייזן
כאניש אזוי קיין געהעריגע אקסן (קרעדיט כאניש)
מ'קעמיך קאנטאקטירן אויף handymanivelt ביי דזשימעיל
מ'קעמיך קאנטאקטירן אויף handymanivelt ביי דזשימעיל
-
יואל שרייבער
- שר שלשת אלפים
- תגובות: 3681
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: דינסטאג אפריל 04, 2017 1:33 am
-
יואל שרייבער
- שר שלשת אלפים
- תגובות: 3681
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: דינסטאג אפריל 04, 2017 1:33 am
הענדימען האט געשריבן:יואל שרייבער האט געשריבן:איך פארשטיי נישט ווער עס האט אים נישט געלאזט היטן די בארדערס אן א וואנט? קען מען טאקע נישט טרעפן אנדערע וועגן אראפצוברענגען כאטש אביסל די נאמבערס?
מ'דארף האבן אן א שיעור מעען פאוער דערפאר. און מיט דעם אלעם זענען מענטשן נאר מענטשן (און צומאל דאס אויס נישט. קרעדיט רמ"ד קאהן\איינער פון אונזערע ניקס דא אויפן וועלטל) און קענען נישט אייביג, אלעס באווייזן
איך פארשטיי טאקע אז מען קען נישט אינגאנצן צושפארן די גרעניץ אן א וואנט, אבער מען קען נישט טון מער ווי אבאמא האט געטוהן?
חוץ אויב דו וועסט זאגן אז אבאמא האט שוין טאקע געטון די מאקסימום וואס מען קען.
-
נאך פונדערהיים
- שר האלפיים
- תגובות: 2937
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: מיטוואך מאי 02, 2018 10:59 am
די אפיציעלע פראקלאמאציע פונעם ווייסן הויז איבער די פרישע אימיגראציע פאליסיס:
The United States expects the arrival at the border between the United States and Mexico (southern border) of a substantial number of aliens primarily from Central America who appear to have no lawful basis for admission into our country. They are traveling in large, organized groups through Mexico and reportedly intend to enter the United States unlawfully or without proper documentation and to seek asylum, despite the fact that, based on past experience, a significant majority will not be eligible for or be granted that benefit. Many entered Mexico unlawfully — some with violence — and have rejected opportunities to apply for asylum and benefits in Mexico. The arrival of large numbers of aliens will contribute to the overloading of our immigration and asylum system and to the release of thousands of aliens into the interior of the United States. The continuing and threatened mass migration of aliens with no basis for admission into the United States through our southern border has precipitated a crisis and undermines the integrity of our borders. I therefore must take immediate action to protect the national interest, and to maintain the effectiveness of the asylum system for legitimate asylum seekers who demonstrate that they have fled persecution and warrant the many special benefits associated with asylum.
In recent weeks, an average of approximately 2,000 inadmissible aliens have entered each day at our southern border. In Fiscal Year 2018 overall, 124,511 aliens were found inadmissible at ports of entry on the southern border, while 396,579 aliens were apprehended entering the United States unlawfully between such ports of entry. The great number of aliens who cross unlawfully into the United States through the southern border consumes tremendous resources as the Government seeks to surveil, apprehend, screen, process, and detain them.
Aliens who enter the United States unlawfully or without proper documentation and are subject to expedited removal may avoid being promptly removed by demonstrating, during an initial screening process, a credible fear of persecution or torture. Approximately 2 decades ago, most aliens deemed inadmissible at a port of entry or apprehended after unlawfully entering the United States through the southern border were single adults who were promptly returned to Mexico, and very few asserted a fear of return. Since then, however, there has been a massive increase in fear-of-persecution or torture claims by aliens who enter the United States through the southern border. The vast majority of such aliens are found to satisfy the credible-fear threshold, although only a fraction of the claimants whose claims are adjudicated ultimately qualify for asylum or other protection. Aliens found to have a credible fear are often released into the interior of the United States, as a result of a lack of detention space and a variety of other legal and practical difficulties, pending adjudication of their claims in a full removal proceeding in immigration court. The immigration adjudication process often takes years to complete because of the growing volume of claims and because of the need to expedite proceedings for detained aliens. During that time, many released aliens fail to appear for hearings, do not comply with subsequent orders of removal, or are difficult to locate and remove.
Members of family units pose particular challenges. The Federal Government lacks sufficient facilities to house families together. Virtually all members of family units who enter the United States through the southern border, unlawfully or without proper documentation, and that are found to have a credible fear of persecution, are thus released into the United States. Against this backdrop of near-assurance of release, the number of such aliens traveling as family units who enter through the southern border and claim a credible fear of persecution has greatly increased. And large numbers of family units decide to make the dangerous and unlawful border crossing with their children.
The United States has a long and proud history of offering protection to aliens who are fleeing persecution and torture and who qualify under the standards articulated in our immigration laws, including through our asylum system and the Refugee Admissions Program. But our system is being overwhelmed by migration through our southern border. Crossing the border to avoid detection and then, if apprehended, claiming a fear of persecution is in too many instances an avenue to near-automatic release into the interior of the United States. Once released, such aliens are very difficult to remove. An additional influx of large groups of aliens arriving at once through the southern border would add tremendous strain to an already taxed system, especially if they avoid orderly processing by unlawfully crossing the southern border.
The entry of large numbers of aliens into the United States unlawfully between ports of entry on the southern border is contrary to the national interest, and our law has long recognized that aliens who seek to lawfully enter the United States must do so at ports of entry. Unlawful entry puts lives of both law enforcement and aliens at risk. By contrast, entry at ports of entry at the southern border allows for orderly processing, which enables the efficient deployment of law enforcement resources across our vast southern border.
Failing to take immediate action to stem the mass migration the United States is currently experiencing and anticipating would only encourage additional mass unlawful migration and further overwhelming of the system.
Other presidents have taken strong action to prevent mass migration. In Proclamation 4865 of September 29, 1981 (High Seas Interdiction of Illegal Aliens), in response to an influx of Haitian nationals traveling to the United States by sea, President Reagan suspended the entry of undocumented aliens from the high seas and ordered the Coast Guard to intercept such aliens before they reached United States shores and to return them to their point of origin. In Executive Order 12807 of May 24, 1992 (Interdiction of Illegal Aliens), in response to a dramatic increase in the unlawful mass migration of Haitian nationals to the United States, President Bush ordered additional measures to interdict such Haitian nationals and return them to their home country. The Supreme Court upheld the legality of those measures in Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc., 509 U.S. 155 (1993).
I am similarly acting to suspend, for a limited period, the entry of certain aliens in order to address the problem of large numbers of aliens traveling through Mexico to enter our country unlawfully or without proper documentation. I am tailoring the suspension to channel these aliens to ports of entry, so that, if they enter the United States, they do so in an orderly and controlled manner instead of unlawfully. Under this suspension, aliens entering through the southern border, even those without proper documentation, may, consistent with this proclamation, avail themselves of our asylum system, provided that they properly present themselves for inspection at a port of entry. In anticipation of a large group of aliens arriving in the coming weeks, I am directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to commit additional resources to support our ports of entry at the southern border to assist in processing those aliens — and all others arriving at our ports of entry — as efficiently as possible.
But aliens who enter the United States unlawfully through the southern border in contravention of this proclamation will be ineligible to be granted asylum under the regulation promulgated by the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security that became effective earlier today. Those aliens may, however, still seek other forms of protection from persecution or torture. In addition, this limited suspension will facilitate ongoing negotiations with Mexico and other countries regarding appropriate cooperative arrangements to prevent unlawful mass migration to the United States through the southern border. Thus, this proclamation is also necessary to manage and conduct the foreign affairs of the United States effectively.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), respectively) hereby find that, absent the measures set forth in this proclamation, the entry into the United States of persons described in section 1 of this proclamation would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and that their entry should be subject to certain restrictions, limitations, and exceptions. I therefore hereby proclaim the following:
Section 1. Suspension and Limitation on Entry. The entry of any alien into the United States across the international boundary between the United States and Mexico is hereby suspended and limited, subject to section 2 of this proclamation. That suspension and limitation shall expire 90 days after the date of this proclamation or the date on which an agreement permits the United States to remove aliens to Mexico in compliance with the terms of section 208(a)(2)(A) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1158(a)(2)(A)), whichever is earlier.
Sec. 2. Scope and Implementation of Suspension and Limitation on Entry. (a) The suspension and limitation on entry pursuant to section 1 of this proclamation shall apply only to aliens who enter the United States after the date of this proclamation.
(b) The suspension and limitation on entry pursuant to section 1 of this proclamation shall not apply to any alien who enters the United States at a port of entry and properly presents for inspection, or to any lawful permanent resident of the United States.
(c) Nothing in this proclamation shall limit an alien entering the United States from being considered for withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1231(b)(3)) or protection pursuant to the regulations promulgated under the authority of the implementing legislation regarding the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, or limit the statutory processes afforded to unaccompanied alien children upon entering the United States under section 279 of title 6, United States Code, and section 1232 of title 8, United States Code.
(d) No later than 90 days after the date of this proclamation, the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall jointly submit to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, a recommendation on whether an extension or renewal of the suspension or limitation on entry in section 1 of this proclamation is in the interests of the United States.
Sec. 3. Interdiction. The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall consult with the Government of Mexico regarding appropriate steps — consistent with applicable law and the foreign policy, national security, and public-safety interests of the United States — to address the approach of large groups of aliens traveling through Mexico with the intent of entering the United States unlawfully, including efforts to deter, dissuade, and return such aliens before they physically enter United States territory through the southern border.
Sec. 4. Severability. It is the policy of the United States to enforce this proclamation to the maximum extent possible to advance the interests of the United States. Accordingly:
(a) if any provision of this proclamation, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this proclamation and the application of its other provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby; and
(b) if any provision of this proclamation, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid because of the failure to follow certain procedures, the relevant executive branch officials shall implement those procedural requirements to conform with existing law and with any applicable court orders.
Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this proclamation shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This proclamation shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This proclamation is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
ninth day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand eighteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-third.
DONALD J. TRUMP
White House Logo
The White House
The United States expects the arrival at the border between the United States and Mexico (southern border) of a substantial number of aliens primarily from Central America who appear to have no lawful basis for admission into our country. They are traveling in large, organized groups through Mexico and reportedly intend to enter the United States unlawfully or without proper documentation and to seek asylum, despite the fact that, based on past experience, a significant majority will not be eligible for or be granted that benefit. Many entered Mexico unlawfully — some with violence — and have rejected opportunities to apply for asylum and benefits in Mexico. The arrival of large numbers of aliens will contribute to the overloading of our immigration and asylum system and to the release of thousands of aliens into the interior of the United States. The continuing and threatened mass migration of aliens with no basis for admission into the United States through our southern border has precipitated a crisis and undermines the integrity of our borders. I therefore must take immediate action to protect the national interest, and to maintain the effectiveness of the asylum system for legitimate asylum seekers who demonstrate that they have fled persecution and warrant the many special benefits associated with asylum.
In recent weeks, an average of approximately 2,000 inadmissible aliens have entered each day at our southern border. In Fiscal Year 2018 overall, 124,511 aliens were found inadmissible at ports of entry on the southern border, while 396,579 aliens were apprehended entering the United States unlawfully between such ports of entry. The great number of aliens who cross unlawfully into the United States through the southern border consumes tremendous resources as the Government seeks to surveil, apprehend, screen, process, and detain them.
Aliens who enter the United States unlawfully or without proper documentation and are subject to expedited removal may avoid being promptly removed by demonstrating, during an initial screening process, a credible fear of persecution or torture. Approximately 2 decades ago, most aliens deemed inadmissible at a port of entry or apprehended after unlawfully entering the United States through the southern border were single adults who were promptly returned to Mexico, and very few asserted a fear of return. Since then, however, there has been a massive increase in fear-of-persecution or torture claims by aliens who enter the United States through the southern border. The vast majority of such aliens are found to satisfy the credible-fear threshold, although only a fraction of the claimants whose claims are adjudicated ultimately qualify for asylum or other protection. Aliens found to have a credible fear are often released into the interior of the United States, as a result of a lack of detention space and a variety of other legal and practical difficulties, pending adjudication of their claims in a full removal proceeding in immigration court. The immigration adjudication process often takes years to complete because of the growing volume of claims and because of the need to expedite proceedings for detained aliens. During that time, many released aliens fail to appear for hearings, do not comply with subsequent orders of removal, or are difficult to locate and remove.
Members of family units pose particular challenges. The Federal Government lacks sufficient facilities to house families together. Virtually all members of family units who enter the United States through the southern border, unlawfully or without proper documentation, and that are found to have a credible fear of persecution, are thus released into the United States. Against this backdrop of near-assurance of release, the number of such aliens traveling as family units who enter through the southern border and claim a credible fear of persecution has greatly increased. And large numbers of family units decide to make the dangerous and unlawful border crossing with their children.
The United States has a long and proud history of offering protection to aliens who are fleeing persecution and torture and who qualify under the standards articulated in our immigration laws, including through our asylum system and the Refugee Admissions Program. But our system is being overwhelmed by migration through our southern border. Crossing the border to avoid detection and then, if apprehended, claiming a fear of persecution is in too many instances an avenue to near-automatic release into the interior of the United States. Once released, such aliens are very difficult to remove. An additional influx of large groups of aliens arriving at once through the southern border would add tremendous strain to an already taxed system, especially if they avoid orderly processing by unlawfully crossing the southern border.
The entry of large numbers of aliens into the United States unlawfully between ports of entry on the southern border is contrary to the national interest, and our law has long recognized that aliens who seek to lawfully enter the United States must do so at ports of entry. Unlawful entry puts lives of both law enforcement and aliens at risk. By contrast, entry at ports of entry at the southern border allows for orderly processing, which enables the efficient deployment of law enforcement resources across our vast southern border.
Failing to take immediate action to stem the mass migration the United States is currently experiencing and anticipating would only encourage additional mass unlawful migration and further overwhelming of the system.
Other presidents have taken strong action to prevent mass migration. In Proclamation 4865 of September 29, 1981 (High Seas Interdiction of Illegal Aliens), in response to an influx of Haitian nationals traveling to the United States by sea, President Reagan suspended the entry of undocumented aliens from the high seas and ordered the Coast Guard to intercept such aliens before they reached United States shores and to return them to their point of origin. In Executive Order 12807 of May 24, 1992 (Interdiction of Illegal Aliens), in response to a dramatic increase in the unlawful mass migration of Haitian nationals to the United States, President Bush ordered additional measures to interdict such Haitian nationals and return them to their home country. The Supreme Court upheld the legality of those measures in Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc., 509 U.S. 155 (1993).
I am similarly acting to suspend, for a limited period, the entry of certain aliens in order to address the problem of large numbers of aliens traveling through Mexico to enter our country unlawfully or without proper documentation. I am tailoring the suspension to channel these aliens to ports of entry, so that, if they enter the United States, they do so in an orderly and controlled manner instead of unlawfully. Under this suspension, aliens entering through the southern border, even those without proper documentation, may, consistent with this proclamation, avail themselves of our asylum system, provided that they properly present themselves for inspection at a port of entry. In anticipation of a large group of aliens arriving in the coming weeks, I am directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to commit additional resources to support our ports of entry at the southern border to assist in processing those aliens — and all others arriving at our ports of entry — as efficiently as possible.
But aliens who enter the United States unlawfully through the southern border in contravention of this proclamation will be ineligible to be granted asylum under the regulation promulgated by the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security that became effective earlier today. Those aliens may, however, still seek other forms of protection from persecution or torture. In addition, this limited suspension will facilitate ongoing negotiations with Mexico and other countries regarding appropriate cooperative arrangements to prevent unlawful mass migration to the United States through the southern border. Thus, this proclamation is also necessary to manage and conduct the foreign affairs of the United States effectively.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), respectively) hereby find that, absent the measures set forth in this proclamation, the entry into the United States of persons described in section 1 of this proclamation would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and that their entry should be subject to certain restrictions, limitations, and exceptions. I therefore hereby proclaim the following:
Section 1. Suspension and Limitation on Entry. The entry of any alien into the United States across the international boundary between the United States and Mexico is hereby suspended and limited, subject to section 2 of this proclamation. That suspension and limitation shall expire 90 days after the date of this proclamation or the date on which an agreement permits the United States to remove aliens to Mexico in compliance with the terms of section 208(a)(2)(A) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1158(a)(2)(A)), whichever is earlier.
Sec. 2. Scope and Implementation of Suspension and Limitation on Entry. (a) The suspension and limitation on entry pursuant to section 1 of this proclamation shall apply only to aliens who enter the United States after the date of this proclamation.
(b) The suspension and limitation on entry pursuant to section 1 of this proclamation shall not apply to any alien who enters the United States at a port of entry and properly presents for inspection, or to any lawful permanent resident of the United States.
(c) Nothing in this proclamation shall limit an alien entering the United States from being considered for withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1231(b)(3)) or protection pursuant to the regulations promulgated under the authority of the implementing legislation regarding the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, or limit the statutory processes afforded to unaccompanied alien children upon entering the United States under section 279 of title 6, United States Code, and section 1232 of title 8, United States Code.
(d) No later than 90 days after the date of this proclamation, the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall jointly submit to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, a recommendation on whether an extension or renewal of the suspension or limitation on entry in section 1 of this proclamation is in the interests of the United States.
Sec. 3. Interdiction. The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall consult with the Government of Mexico regarding appropriate steps — consistent with applicable law and the foreign policy, national security, and public-safety interests of the United States — to address the approach of large groups of aliens traveling through Mexico with the intent of entering the United States unlawfully, including efforts to deter, dissuade, and return such aliens before they physically enter United States territory through the southern border.
Sec. 4. Severability. It is the policy of the United States to enforce this proclamation to the maximum extent possible to advance the interests of the United States. Accordingly:
(a) if any provision of this proclamation, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this proclamation and the application of its other provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby; and
(b) if any provision of this proclamation, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid because of the failure to follow certain procedures, the relevant executive branch officials shall implement those procedural requirements to conform with existing law and with any applicable court orders.
Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this proclamation shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This proclamation shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This proclamation is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
ninth day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand eighteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-third.
DONALD J. TRUMP
White House Logo
The White House
מילא ווען די קומסט מיט א סברא, שוין, וואס איז שייך זיך צו דינגען... אבער אז די קומסט מיט א פאקט, איז וואס? איך האלט אז די פאקט איז אנדערש!
-
למעלה משבעים
- שר עשרת אלפים
- תגובות: 12437
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: זונטאג מארטש 02, 2008 10:17 pm
- לאקאציע: ערגעץ פארבלאנדזשעט אויף די גראדע וואסערן
יואל שרייבער האט געשריבן:הענדימען האט געשריבן:יואל שרייבער האט געשריבן:איך פארשטיי נישט ווער עס האט אים נישט געלאזט היטן די בארדערס אן א וואנט? קען מען טאקע נישט טרעפן אנדערע וועגן אראפצוברענגען כאטש אביסל די נאמבערס?
מ'דארף האבן אן א שיעור מעען פאוער דערפאר. און מיט דעם אלעם זענען מענטשן נאר מענטשן (און צומאל דאס אויס נישט. קרעדיט רמ"ד קאהן\איינער פון אונזערע ניקס דא אויפן וועלטל) און קענען נישט אייביג, אלעס באווייזן
איך פארשטיי טאקע אז מען קען נישט אינגאנצן צושפארן די גרעניץ אן א וואנט, אבער מען קען נישט טון מער ווי אבאמא האט געטוהן?
חוץ אויב דו וועסט זאגן אז אבאמא האט שוין טאקע געטון די מאקסימום וואס מען קען.
און וואס האט אבאמא געטון?
-
טשאדעלע באדעלע
- שר תשעת אלפים
- תגובות: 9090
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: זונטאג יולי 09, 2017 5:29 pm
- לאקאציע: לי עוועניו קארנער מאנסי בלוד.
-
Think and Thank
- שר חמשת אלפים
- תגובות: 5679
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: דינסטאג יאנואר 09, 2018 11:08 pm
גראדע אויף דעם בילד זעהט טראמפ אויס ווי דער מנהל וואס פרובירט איבערצוהאקן דעם אינגל (שומער) וואס שעלט אויפ'ן מלמד.
אלעס וואס איך שרייב צו פארענטפערן די מדינה איז נאר אלס פאליטיק, כאילו ס'וואלט געווען א גוי'אישע לאנד. למעשה טאר די מדינה נישט עקזיסטירן קיין רגע און דעריבער וועט קיין שום העברת פי ה' נישט מצליח זיין. די אייציגסטע וועג ארויס איז גענצליך אויפגעבן די מדינה.
-
טשאדעלע באדעלע
- שר תשעת אלפים
- תגובות: 9090
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: זונטאג יולי 09, 2017 5:29 pm
- לאקאציע: לי עוועניו קארנער מאנסי בלוד.
-
טשאדעלע באדעלע
- שר תשעת אלפים
- תגובות: 9090
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: זונטאג יולי 09, 2017 5:29 pm
- לאקאציע: לי עוועניו קארנער מאנסי בלוד.
די טראמפ אדמינסטראציע האט ארויסגעגעבן א נייע רעגולאציע אז אזיל רעכט זיכער וועלן נישט זיין בארעכטיגט צו קיין אזיל רעכט אויב זענען זיי דורכגעגאנגען אן אנדערע לאנד אויפן וועג קיין אמעריקע און נישט איינגעגעבן דארט פאר אזיל רעכט. די רעגולאציע גייט אריין אין קראפט תיכף ומיד. עס איז ערווארטעט אנצוקומען אין די געריכטן.
A new fast-track asylum regulation will prevent migrants from seeking asylum in the U.S. if they first pass through another country and don't apply for protection in that nation.
The regulation — first reported by POLITICO in May — would effectively cut off asylum protections for Central American migrants who travel to the U.S.-Mexico border from their home country.
The measure will publish in the Federal Register Tuesday and will take effect immediately. Migrants who entered the U.S. before the effective date will not be subject to the new standard, according to an advance notice posted online Monday.
The move, which comes as President Donald Trump continues to grapple with a recent surge of migration on the southwest border, likely will face court challenges. A federal judge in November temporarily halted a similar Trump policy that blocked migrants who cross between ports of entry from seeking asylum.
President Trump was scheduled to meet Monday at the White House with Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales to discuss a possible asylum pact, but the Guatemalan government announced Sunday that the meeting would be postponed amid legal challenges in Guatemala.
U.S. and Mexico officials also have considered the possibility of asylum talks. Mexican officials quietly agreed in June to engage in discussions related to a “safe third country” or regional asylum pact if a current set of counter-migration measures falls to reduce the number of attempted crossings.
The regulation — first reported by POLITICO in May — would effectively cut off asylum protections for Central American migrants who travel to the U.S.-Mexico border from their home country.
The measure will publish in the Federal Register Tuesday and will take effect immediately. Migrants who entered the U.S. before the effective date will not be subject to the new standard, according to an advance notice posted online Monday.
The move, which comes as President Donald Trump continues to grapple with a recent surge of migration on the southwest border, likely will face court challenges. A federal judge in November temporarily halted a similar Trump policy that blocked migrants who cross between ports of entry from seeking asylum.
President Trump was scheduled to meet Monday at the White House with Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales to discuss a possible asylum pact, but the Guatemalan government announced Sunday that the meeting would be postponed amid legal challenges in Guatemala.
U.S. and Mexico officials also have considered the possibility of asylum talks. Mexican officials quietly agreed in June to engage in discussions related to a “safe third country” or regional asylum pact if a current set of counter-migration measures falls to reduce the number of attempted crossings.
-
קאטטשקעלע
- שר חמישים ומאתים
- תגובות: 411
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: דאנערשטאג מארטש 24, 2011 8:52 am
- לאקאציע: ביי די טאטערס
מאכט סענטס
פארשער האט געשריבן:די טראמפ אדמינסטראציע האט ארויסגעגעבן א נייע רעגולאציע אז אזיל רעכט זיכער וועלן נישט זיין בארעכטיגט צו קיין אזיל רעכט אויב זענען זיי דורכגעגאנגען אן אנדערע לאנד אויפן וועג קיין אמעריקע און נישט איינגעגעבן דארט פאר אזיל רעכט. די רעגולאציע גייט אריין אין קראפט תיכף ומיד. עס איז ערווארטעט אנצוקומען אין די געריכטן.A new fast-track asylum regulation will prevent migrants from seeking asylum in the U.S. if they first pass through another country and don't apply for protection in that nation.
The regulation — first reported by POLITICO in May — would effectively cut off asylum protections for Central American migrants who travel to the U.S.-Mexico border from their home country.
The measure will publish in the Federal Register Tuesday and will take effect immediately. Migrants who entered the U.S. before the effective date will not be subject to the new standard, according to an advance notice posted online Monday.
The move, which comes as President Donald Trump continues to grapple with a recent surge of migration on the southwest border, likely will face court challenges. A federal judge in November temporarily halted a similar Trump policy that blocked migrants who cross between ports of entry from seeking asylum.
President Trump was scheduled to meet Monday at the White House with Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales to discuss a possible asylum pact, but the Guatemalan government announced Sunday that the meeting would be postponed amid legal challenges in Guatemala.
U.S. and Mexico officials also have considered the possibility of asylum talks. Mexican officials quietly agreed in June to engage in discussions related to a “safe third country” or regional asylum pact if a current set of counter-migration measures falls to reduce the number of attempted crossings.
װאזױ קען מען װיסען בכלל צו דער אימיגראנט איז שױן דורכגעגאנגען אן אנדערע לאנד אויפן וועג קיין אמעריקע אפשר איז יענער א מעקסיקאנער װאס אנטלױפט פון מעקסיקא אז נישט װעט דער אימיגראנט עכ״פ אזױ טאהנען? אױך װאס װעט בכלל העלפען די פאלעסי אױב יענער דארף סײװי באקימען א קארט דעיט דאס מײנט אז מ׳מיז קודם יענעם סײװי ארײנלאזן אין אײנמאהל יענער איז אין אמעריקע הײבט זיך שױן אן אלע דרײדליך װאס אלעאימיגראנטען טיען צב״ש נישט אנקימען צום געריכט וכו׳
א פייער ברענט אין הארץ פון א יוד
שריי אויס בקול רם
בחר בנו מכל עם
א זכיה צו זיין א יוד
שריי אויס בקול רם
בחר בנו מכל עם
א זכיה צו זיין א יוד
Trump announces asylum deal with Guatemala
President Donald Trump said Friday that the United States had struck an asylum agreement with Guatemala.
Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump told reporters he had reached a safe third country deal with the Central American nation.
The administration did not immediately release text of the agreement. But acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan said it would require migrants who pass through Guatemala en route to the U.S. to first seek asylum in that nation.
"We've long been working with Guatemala and now we can do it the right way,” Trump said, calling it a “landmark” deal. “It's going to be terrific for them and terrific for the United States.”
Trump has railed at Guatemala in recent days for allegedly backing out of asylum negotiations with the U.S. The Guatemalan government earlier this month called off a meeting between Trump and Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales amid litigation in that country’s top court challenging the asylum discussions.
In a tweet this week, Trump said his administration was weighing retaliation against Guatemala that included a possible travel ban, tariffs, and a fee on remittances — a significant source of economic activity in that country.
The threats aimed at Guatemala followed a similar campaign targeting Mexico last month for a perceived lack of commitment to combating illegal immigration. The U.S. and Mexico struck a deal in June that required Mexico to deploy 6,000 National Guard members to intercept migrants.
The latest agreement follows a federal judge’s decision earlier this week to temporarily block a Trump administration regulation that sought to deny asylum to migrants who passed through another country without first seeking protections there.
Pro-migrant groups have blasted the idea that asylum seekers will be protected in Guatemala, which had a murder rate more than five times that of the U.S. in 2016.
In a call with reporters following the White House event, McAleenan said the deal would not be effective immediately, but he expected it would be implemented by August.
“We have several procedural steps in both governments to ratify and recognize the agreement and then put it into effect, but we’re expecting to move forward through those procedures in the next several weeks,” he said.
McAleenan faced several questions from reporters about the conditions in Guatemala for asylum seekers and capacity of the country’s asylum system.
McAleenan did not offer specifics about the country’s current ability to receive and process asylum seekers but said the United Nations, State Department, and DHS were working with officials there to improve it.
“Guatemala has historically offered both safety and protection, as well as opportunities for employment for people seeking asylum,” he said. “I think it’s risky to label an entire country as unsafe. … There are obviously places in Guatemala and in the U.S. that are dangerous, but that does not mean that it doesn’t have an appropriate process.”
During the event at the White House on Friday, Trump was joined by McAleenan and Guatemalan Interior Minister Enrique Degenhart.
Guatemala’s top court earlier this month blocked Morales from immediately engaging in asylum talks with Trump, but Degenhart stressed Friday that the court’s decision was “provisional.” He said his government still could take steps to determine how to implement the asylum agreement.
McAleenan also argued that the pact could move forward in Guatemala.“They believe that they can work this through consistent with their legal regime and the constitutional court oversight,” he said on the call with reporters.
In a statement related to the deal, the Guatemalan government asserted that the pact would prevent “serious economic and social repercussions.” In addition, the country tied the asylum deal to a separate U.S. commitment to speed up the processing of visas for Guatemalan farm workers.
The Guatemalan government also tweeted out a Spanish-language version of the asylum pact.
The offices of two top Democrats told POLITICO they had not been notified of the agreement or provided a copy of the text prior to the signing event.
Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, ripped the pact as “cruel and immoral” in a written statement.
“Simply put, Guatemala is not a safe country for refugees and asylum seekers,” he said, adding that he expected the move to be challenged in court.
Caitlin Oprysko contributed to this report.
Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump told reporters he had reached a safe third country deal with the Central American nation.
The administration did not immediately release text of the agreement. But acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan said it would require migrants who pass through Guatemala en route to the U.S. to first seek asylum in that nation.
"We've long been working with Guatemala and now we can do it the right way,” Trump said, calling it a “landmark” deal. “It's going to be terrific for them and terrific for the United States.”
Trump has railed at Guatemala in recent days for allegedly backing out of asylum negotiations with the U.S. The Guatemalan government earlier this month called off a meeting between Trump and Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales amid litigation in that country’s top court challenging the asylum discussions.
In a tweet this week, Trump said his administration was weighing retaliation against Guatemala that included a possible travel ban, tariffs, and a fee on remittances — a significant source of economic activity in that country.
The threats aimed at Guatemala followed a similar campaign targeting Mexico last month for a perceived lack of commitment to combating illegal immigration. The U.S. and Mexico struck a deal in June that required Mexico to deploy 6,000 National Guard members to intercept migrants.
The latest agreement follows a federal judge’s decision earlier this week to temporarily block a Trump administration regulation that sought to deny asylum to migrants who passed through another country without first seeking protections there.
Pro-migrant groups have blasted the idea that asylum seekers will be protected in Guatemala, which had a murder rate more than five times that of the U.S. in 2016.
In a call with reporters following the White House event, McAleenan said the deal would not be effective immediately, but he expected it would be implemented by August.
“We have several procedural steps in both governments to ratify and recognize the agreement and then put it into effect, but we’re expecting to move forward through those procedures in the next several weeks,” he said.
McAleenan faced several questions from reporters about the conditions in Guatemala for asylum seekers and capacity of the country’s asylum system.
McAleenan did not offer specifics about the country’s current ability to receive and process asylum seekers but said the United Nations, State Department, and DHS were working with officials there to improve it.
“Guatemala has historically offered both safety and protection, as well as opportunities for employment for people seeking asylum,” he said. “I think it’s risky to label an entire country as unsafe. … There are obviously places in Guatemala and in the U.S. that are dangerous, but that does not mean that it doesn’t have an appropriate process.”
During the event at the White House on Friday, Trump was joined by McAleenan and Guatemalan Interior Minister Enrique Degenhart.
Guatemala’s top court earlier this month blocked Morales from immediately engaging in asylum talks with Trump, but Degenhart stressed Friday that the court’s decision was “provisional.” He said his government still could take steps to determine how to implement the asylum agreement.
McAleenan also argued that the pact could move forward in Guatemala.“They believe that they can work this through consistent with their legal regime and the constitutional court oversight,” he said on the call with reporters.
In a statement related to the deal, the Guatemalan government asserted that the pact would prevent “serious economic and social repercussions.” In addition, the country tied the asylum deal to a separate U.S. commitment to speed up the processing of visas for Guatemalan farm workers.
The Guatemalan government also tweeted out a Spanish-language version of the asylum pact.
The offices of two top Democrats told POLITICO they had not been notified of the agreement or provided a copy of the text prior to the signing event.
Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, ripped the pact as “cruel and immoral” in a written statement.
“Simply put, Guatemala is not a safe country for refugees and asylum seekers,” he said, adding that he expected the move to be challenged in court.
Caitlin Oprysko contributed to this report.
-
טשאדעלע באדעלע
- שר תשעת אלפים
- תגובות: 9090
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: זונטאג יולי 09, 2017 5:29 pm
- לאקאציע: לי עוועניו קארנער מאנסי בלוד.
Re: טראמפ אימיגראציע פאלעסי
טראמפ זאגט אז ער גרייט זיך אינטערצושרייבן א ברייטע עקזעקאטיוו ארדער אויף אימיגראציע, וואס וועט אויך האבן אין זיך דאקא ( 
)
ער זאגט קלאר אז דאס קומט נאך די סופרים קארט פסק בלויז עטליכע וואכן צוריק וואס האט באפעסטיגט דעם פרעזידענט׳ס עקזעקאטיוו מאכט.
ער איז נישט אריין אין קיין דעטאלן.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ttsg3a9h3oejn ... 5.mp4?dl=0
) ער זאגט קלאר אז דאס קומט נאך די סופרים קארט פסק בלויז עטליכע וואכן צוריק וואס האט באפעסטיגט דעם פרעזידענט׳ס עקזעקאטיוו מאכט.
ער איז נישט אריין אין קיין דעטאלן.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ttsg3a9h3oejn ... 5.mp4?dl=0
רשעות קאלטע סעלצער
-
כאפצעם
- שר עשרת אלפים
- תגובות: 18243
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: דאנערשטאג יולי 10, 2014 9:28 am
- לאקאציע: לויפט
Re: טראמפ אימיגראציע פאלעסי
דאקא דעפארטאציע פראטעקציע איז דאך שוין דא, ער זאגט ער וויל אויך סטיזענשיפ. שטייצעך ער גייט נישט סיינען אן עקזעקיטיוו ארדער צו טיילן סיטיזענשיפ פאר א מיליאן אימיגראנטן.. ספעציעל עטליכע חדשים פאר עלעקשאן. סאו דאס מיינט ווארשיינליך אזא נוסח ווי אז ער באאויפטראגט די נויטיגע אגענטורן צו "שטודירן" דאס געבן סיטיזענשיפ און באפעסטיגן די מערב גרעניץ. סאמטינג לייק דעט..
-
טשאדעלע באדעלע
- שר תשעת אלפים
- תגובות: 9090
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: זונטאג יולי 09, 2017 5:29 pm
- לאקאציע: לי עוועניו קארנער מאנסי בלוד.
Re: טראמפ אימיגראציע פאלעסי
בישות.
היינט האט האריקעין חנה אדורכגעשניטן חלקים פון דרום טעקסעס, צווישן די פילע שאדענס ציילט זיך א שטיקל פון טראמפ׳ס גרעניץ וואנט.. וואס האט זיך צוזאמגעלייגט פון די שטארקע ווינטן.
עס האט נישט געטארט געשעהן אזאנס.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/coyqcj7q6sf6c ... 6.mp4?dl=0
היינט האט האריקעין חנה אדורכגעשניטן חלקים פון דרום טעקסעס, צווישן די פילע שאדענס ציילט זיך א שטיקל פון טראמפ׳ס גרעניץ וואנט.. וואס האט זיך צוזאמגעלייגט פון די שטארקע ווינטן.
עס האט נישט געטארט געשעהן אזאנס.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/coyqcj7q6sf6c ... 6.mp4?dl=0
רשעות קאלטע סעלצער
-
פער בריסטאו
- שר ארבעת האלפים
- תגובות: 4653
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: מיטוואך פעברואר 13, 2013 8:36 pm
Re: טראמפ אימיגראציע פאלעסי
טשאדעלע באדעלע האט געשריבן:בישות.
היינט האט האריקעין חנה אדורכגעשניטן חלקים פון דרום טעקסעס, צווישן די פילע שאדענס ציילט זיך א שטיקל פון טראמפ׳ס גרעניץ וואנט.. וואס האט זיך צוזאמגעלייגט פון די שטארקע ווינטן.
עס האט נישט געטארט געשעהן אזאנס.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/coyqcj7q6sf6c ... 6.mp4?dl=0
יא קען געשען פון א האריקעין. וויפעל שטעט און דערפלעך ווערן דיסטרויט וועגן האריקעינס. ווי שטארק קענסטו מאכן א וואנט?
טענק יו פאר טשוזינג מעריאַט האוטעל
-
shimon7323
- שר חמשת אלפים
- תגובות: 5640
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: דינסטאג פעברואר 14, 2012 9:21 pm
- לאקאציע: שיך
- פארבינד זיך:
Re: טראמפ אימיגראציע פאלעסי
בשעת'ן בויען טאר נישט א וואנט אראפ פאלן פון שטארקע ווינטן? וואסי דער בישות?
Re: טראמפ אימיגראציע פאלעסי
די איין מייל וואס ער האט געבויעט איז אויך צוזאם געפאלען. א פחד!
האב שכל און גיב א שמייכעל!
-
טשאדעלע באדעלע
- שר תשעת אלפים
- תגובות: 9090
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: זונטאג יולי 09, 2017 5:29 pm
- לאקאציע: לי עוועניו קארנער מאנסי בלוד.
Re: טראמפ אימיגראציע פאלעסי
פער בריסטאו האט געשריבן:טשאדעלע באדעלע האט געשריבן:בישות.
היינט האט האריקעין חנה אדורכגעשניטן חלקים פון דרום טעקסעס, צווישן די פילע שאדענס ציילט זיך א שטיקל פון טראמפ׳ס גרעניץ וואנט.. וואס האט זיך צוזאמגעלייגט פון די שטארקע ווינטן.
עס האט נישט געטארט געשעהן אזאנס.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/coyqcj7q6sf6c ... 6.mp4?dl=0
יא קען געשען פון א האריקעין. וויפעל שטעט און דערפלעך ווערן דיסטרויט וועגן האריקעינס. ווי שטארק קענסטו מאכן א וואנט?
איך בין מסכים.
נאכמער, ביז ווען טראמפ איז געווען פרעזידענט האבן די גרעניץ ווענט נישט צוזאמגעפאלן פון קיין האריקעינס...
ווייל ס׳איז נישט געווען קיין ווענט.
רשעות קאלטע סעלצער
-
טשאדעלע באדעלע
- שר תשעת אלפים
- תגובות: 9090
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: זונטאג יולי 09, 2017 5:29 pm
- לאקאציע: לי עוועניו קארנער מאנסי בלוד.
Re: טראמפ אימיגראציע פאלעסי
shimon7323 האט געשריבן:בשעת'ן בויען טאר נישט א וואנט אראפ פאלן פון שטארקע ווינטן? וואסי דער בישות?
ארויסגיין אויפן גאס מיט א שלאף קאפל איז בישות? מ׳קען שוין מיינען, יעדער מעג אזאנס פארגעסן..
די פאקט אז ס׳איז דא א קליפ ווי מ׳זעהט א שטיקל וואנט פאלט צוזאם איז בישות.
ס׳מיינט עפעס? ניין. דערווייל איז עס איבער 400 מייל לאנג.. ס׳איז גארנישט געשעהן אז 150 פיס איז אראפגעפאלן.
רשעות קאלטע סעלצער
