@realDonaldTrump: The two biggest opponents of ICE in America today are the Democratic Party and MS-13!
m.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
טראמפ אדמיניסטראציע - נייעס און נאטיצן
די אחראים: יאנאש,אחראי,געלעגער
-
ארום די זייגער
- שר חמש מאות
- תגובות: 878
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: זונטאג פעברואר 28, 2016 1:23 pm
- לאקאציע: אין קאך
-
לאלתר לחיים
- שר האלף
- תגובות: 1462
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: זונטאג מארטש 18, 2012 11:50 pm
-
לאלתר לחיים
- שר האלף
- תגובות: 1462
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: זונטאג מארטש 18, 2012 11:50 pm
-
פאליק
- שר ששת אלפים
- תגובות: 6836
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: מאנטאג אוגוסט 31, 2015 5:47 pm
- לאקאציע: אין אוועל אפיס ביי די גאלדענע טעפיך
פאר ווער עס וויל האבן אביסל א טיפערע בליק וואס דא גייט פאר און אביסל ארויסהאבן אונזער ארום הודו זאל אין א רואיגע מינוט אדורכלייעענען דעם ארטיקל
(נישט געאייגנט פאר שטארקע העטערס וואס נעמען זאכן פערזענליך)
יישר כוח פאר די ניק פארן עס אריינשיקן
That’s why they all are billionaires and all got elected president.
It really is quite simple. Everyone is smart except Donald J. Trump. That’s why they all are billionaires and all got elected President. Only Trump does not know what he is doing. Only Trump does not know how to negotiate with Vladimir Putin. Anderson Cooper knows how to stand up to Putin. The whole crowd at MSNBC does. All the journalists do.
They could not stand up to Matt Lauer at NBC. They could not stand up to Charlie Rose at CBS. They could not stand up to Mark Halperin at NBC. Nor up to Leon Wieseltier at the New Republic, nor Jann Wenner at Rolling Stone, nor Michael Oreskes at NPR, at the New York Times, or at the Associated Press. But — oh, wow! — can they ever stand up to Putin! Only Trump is incapable of negotiating with the Russian tyrant.
Remember the four years when Anderson Cooper was President of the United States? And before that — when the entire Washington Post editorial staff jointly were elected to be President? Remember? Neither do I.
The Seedier Media never have negotiated life and death, not corporate life and death, and not human life and death. They think they know how to negotiate, but they do not know how. They go to a college, are told by peers that they are smart, get some good grades, proceed to a graduate degree in journalism, and get hired as analysts. Now they are experts, ready to take on Putin and the Iranian Ayatollahs at age 30.
That is not the road to expertise in tough dealing. The alternate road is that, along the way, maybe you get forced into some street fights. Sometimes the other guy wins, and sometimes you beat the intestines out of him. Then you deal with grown-ups as you mature, and you learn that people can be nasty, often after they smile and speak softly. You get cheated a few times, played. And you learn. Maybe you become an attorney litigating multi-million-dollar case matters. Say what you will about attorneys, but those years — not the years in law school, not the years drafting legal memoranda, but the years of meeting face-to-face and confronting opposing counsel — those years can teach a great deal. They can teach how to transition from sweet, gentle, diplomatic negotiating to tough negotiating. At some point, with enough tough-nosed experience, you figure out Trump’s “The Art of the Deal” yourself.
Trump’s voters get him because not only is he we, but we are he. We were not snowflaked-for-life by effete professors who themselves never had negotiated tough life-or-death serious deals. Instead we live in the real world, and we know how that works. Not based on social science theories, not based on “conceptual negotiating models.” But based on the people we have met over life and always will hate. That worst boss we ever had. The coworker who tried to sabotage us. We know the sons of bums whom we survived, the dastardly types who are out there, and we learned from those experiences how to deal with them. We won’t have John Kerry soothe us by having James Taylor sing “You’ve Got a Friend” carols.
The Bushes got us into all kinds of messes. The first one killed the economic miracle that Reagan had fashioned. The second one screwed up the Middle East, where Iraq and Iran beautifully were engaged in killing each other for years, and he got us mired into the middle of the muddle. Clinton was too busy with Monica Lewinsky to protect us from Osama bin Laden when we had him in our sights. Hillary gave us Benghazi and more. And Obama and Kerry gave us the Iran Deal, ISIS run amok, America in retreat. All to the daily praise of a media who now attack Trump every minute of every day.
So let us understand a few things:
Negotiating with NATO:
NATO is our friend. They also rip off America. They have been ripping us off forever. We saved their butts — before there even was a NATO — in World War I. They messed up, and 116,456 Americans had to die to save their butts. Then they messed up again for the next two decades because West Europeans are effete and so obsessed with their class manners and their rules of savoir faire and their socialist welfare states and their early retirements that they did not have the character to stand up to Hitler in the 1930s. Peace in our time. So they messed up, and we had to save their butts again. And another 405,399 Americans died for them during World War II. And then we had to rebuild them! And we had to station our boys in Germany and all over their blood-stained continent. So, hey, we love those guys. We love NATO.
And yet they still rip us off. We pay 4% of our gigantic gross domestic product to protect them, and they will not pay a lousy 2% of their GDP towards their own defense. Is there a culture more penny-pinching-cheap-and-stingy than the fine constituents of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization? These cheap baseborn prigs will not pay their fare. They are too cheap. They expect America to send boys to die for them in one world war, then another — hundreds of thousands — and then to pay for their NATO defense even a century later.
And then they have the temerity to cheat us further in trade. Long before Trump, they set up tariffs against us for so many things. If the average American knew how badly Europe has been ripping us off for decades with their tariffs, no one in this country would buy anything European again. We would say, as a matter of self-respect and personal pride, “I no longer will buy anything but American, no matter what it costs.”
Every American President has complained about the cheating and imbalance — the NATO penny-pinching-cheapness, the tariff and trade imbalances. In more recent years, the various Bushes complained about it. Even Obama complained about it. But they all did it so gently, so diplomatically. They would deliver the sermon, just as the pastor predictably tells the church-goers on Sunday morning that he is against sin, and the Europeans would sit quietly and nod their heads — nodding from sleeping, not from agreeing — and then they would go back out and sin some more. Another four years of America being suckered and snookered. All they had to do was give Obama a Nobel Peace Prize his ninth month in office and let Kerry ride his bike around Paris.
So Trump did what any effective negotiator would do: he took note of past approaches to NATO and their failures, and correctly determined that the only way to get these penny-pinching-cheap baseborn prigs to pay their freight would be to bulldoze right into their faces, stare them right in their glazed eyes with cameras rolling, and tell them point-blank the equivalent of: “You are the cheapest penny-pinching, miserly, stingy, tightwadded skinflints ever. And it is going to stop on my watch. Whatever it takes from my end, you selfish, curmudgeonly cheap prigs, you are going to pay your fair share. I am not being diplomatic. I am being All-Business: either you start to pay or, wow, are you in for some surprises! And you know what you read in the Fake News: I am crazy! I am out of control! So, lemme see. I know: We will go to trade war! How do you like that? Maybe we even will pull all our troops out of Europe. Hmmm. Yeah, maybe. Why not? Sounds good. Well, let’s see.”
So Trump stuffed it into their quiche-and-schnitzel ingesting faces. And he convinced them — thanks to America’s Seedier Media who are the real secret to the “Legend That is Trump” — that he just might be crazy enough to go to trade war and to pull American boys home. They knew that Clinton and Bush x 2 and Kerry and Hillary and Nobel Laureate Obama never would do it. But they also know that Trump just might. And if they think they are going to find comfort and moderating in his new advisers, John Bolton and Mike Pompeo, alongside him….
Nuh-uh.
So CNN and the Washington Post and all the Seedier Media attacked Trump for days: He is destroying the alliance! He attacks our friends!
Baloney. Obama was the one whom the Left Echo Chamber… Chamber… Chamber never called out for attacking our friends — Israel, Britain, so many others — while cozying up to Hugo Chavez, bowing to dictators, and dancing the tango for Raul Castro. Trump is just the opposite: He knows who the friends are, and he wants to maintain and strengthen those friendships. It is no different from a parent telling a 35-year-old son: “I have been supporting you for thirty-five years. I put you through college by signing four years and $100,000 in PLUS Loans. You graduated college fifteen years ago. For fifteen years I have been asking you nicely to look for a job and to start contributing. Instead, you sit home all day playing video games, texting your friends on a smartphone I pay for, and picking little fuzz balls out of your navel. So, look, I love you. You are my flesh and blood. But if you are not employed and earning a paycheck — and contributing to the cost of this household — in six months, we are throwing you out of the house.” That boy is NATO. Trump is Dad. And all of us have been signing for the PLUS Loans.
Negotiating with Putin
Putin is a bad guy. A really bad guy. He is better than Lenin. Better than Stalin, Khrushchev, Kosygin, Brezhnev, Pol Pot, Mao. But he is a really bad guy.
Here’s the thing: Putin is a dictator. He answers to no one. He does whatever he wants. If there arises an opponent, that guy dies. Maybe the opponent gets poked with a poisoned umbrella. Maybe he gets shot on the street. Maybe the opponent is forced to watch Susan Rice interviews telling the world that Benghazi happened because of a YouTube video seen by nine derelicts in Berkeley and that Bowe Berghdal served with honor and distinction. But, one way or another, the opponent dies.
Trump knows this about Putin. And here is what that means:
If you insult Putin in public, like by telling the newsmedia just before or after meeting with him that he is the Butcher of Crimea, and he messed with our elections, and is an overall jerk — then you will get nothing behind closed doors from Putin. Putin will decide “To heck with you, and to heck with the relationship we just forged.” Putin will get even, will take intense personal revenge, even if it is bad for Russia — even if it is bad for Putin. Because there are no institutional reins on him.
But if you go in public and tell everyone that Putin is a nice guy (y’know, just like Kim Jong Un) and that Putin intensely maintains that he did not mess with elections — not sweet little Putey Wutey (even though he obviously did) — then you next can maintain the momentum established beforehand in the private room. You can proceed to remind Putin what you told him privately: that this garbage has to stop — or else. That if he messes in Syria, we will do “X.” If he messes with our Iran boycott, we will do “Y.” We will generate so much oil from hydraulic fracturing and from ANWR and from all our sources that we will glut the market — if not tomorrow, then a year from now. We will send even more lethal offensive military weapons to Ukraine. We can restore the promised shield to Eastern Europe that Obama withdrew. And even if we cannot mess with Russian elections (because they have no elections), they do have computers — and, so help us, we will mess with their technology in a way they cannot imagine. Trump knows from his advisers what we can do. If he sweet-talks Putin in public — just Putin on the Ritz — then everything that Trump has told Putin privately can be reinforced with action, and he even can wedge concessions because, against that background, Putin knows that no one will believe that he made any concessions. Everyone is set to believe that Putin is getting whatever he wants, that Trump understands nothing. So, in that setting, Putin can make concessions and still save face.
That is why Trump talks about him that way. And that is the only possible way to do it when negotiating with a tyrant who has no checks and balances on him. If you embarrass the tyrant publicly, then the tyrant never will make concessions because he will fear that people will say he was intimidated and backed down. And that he never will do. Meanwhile, Trump has expelled 60 Russians from America, reversed Obama policy and sent lethal weapons to Ukraine, and is pressing Germany severely on its pipeline project with Russia.
The Bottom Line
At the end of the day, Donald Trump is over seventy years old. He has made many mistakes in his life. He still makes some. He is human. But Trump likewise has spent three score and a dozen years learning. He has seen some of his businesses go bankrupt, and he has learned from those experiences to be a billionaire and not let it happen again. No doubt that he has been fooled, outsmarted in years past. And he has learned from life.
He is a tough and smart negotiator. He sizes up his opponent, and he knows that the approach that works best for one is not the same as for another. It does not matter what he says publicly about his negotiating opponent. What matters is what results months later. In his first eighteen months in Washington, this man has turned around the American economy, brought us near full employment, reduced the welfare and food stamp lines, wiped out ISIS in Raqqa, moved America’s Israel embassy to Jerusalem, successfully has launched massive deregulation of the economy, has opened oil exploration in ANWR, is rebuilding the military massively, has walked out of the useless Paris Climate Accords that were negotiated by America’s amateurs who always get snookered, canned the disastrous Iran Deal, exited the bogus United Nations Human Rights Council. He has Canada and Mexico convinced he will walk out of NAFTA if they do not pony up, and he has the Europeans convinced he will walk out of NATO if they don’t stop being the cheap and lazy parasitic penny-pinchers they are. He has slashed income taxes, expanded legal protections for college students falsely accused of crimes, has taken real steps to protect religious freedoms and liberties promised in the First Amendment, boldly has taken on the lyme-disease-quality of a legislative mess that he inherited from Reagan-Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama on immigration, and has appointed a steady line of remarkably brilliant conservative federal judges to sit on the district courts, the circuit appellate courts, and the Supreme Court.
What has Anderson Cooper achieved during that period? Jim Acosta or the editorial staffs of the New York Times and Washington Post? They have not even found the courage and strength to stand up to the coworkers and celebrities within their orbits who abuse sexually or psychologically or emotionally. They have no accomplishments to compare to his. Just their effete opinions, all echoing each other, all echoing, echoing, echoing. They gave us eight years of Nobel Peace Laureate Obama negotiating with the ISIS JV team, calming the rise of the oceans, and healing the planet.
We will take Trump negotiating with Putin any day
(נישט געאייגנט פאר שטארקע העטערס וואס נעמען זאכן פערזענליך)
יישר כוח פאר די ניק פארן עס אריינשיקן
That’s why they all are billionaires and all got elected president.
It really is quite simple. Everyone is smart except Donald J. Trump. That’s why they all are billionaires and all got elected President. Only Trump does not know what he is doing. Only Trump does not know how to negotiate with Vladimir Putin. Anderson Cooper knows how to stand up to Putin. The whole crowd at MSNBC does. All the journalists do.
They could not stand up to Matt Lauer at NBC. They could not stand up to Charlie Rose at CBS. They could not stand up to Mark Halperin at NBC. Nor up to Leon Wieseltier at the New Republic, nor Jann Wenner at Rolling Stone, nor Michael Oreskes at NPR, at the New York Times, or at the Associated Press. But — oh, wow! — can they ever stand up to Putin! Only Trump is incapable of negotiating with the Russian tyrant.
Remember the four years when Anderson Cooper was President of the United States? And before that — when the entire Washington Post editorial staff jointly were elected to be President? Remember? Neither do I.
The Seedier Media never have negotiated life and death, not corporate life and death, and not human life and death. They think they know how to negotiate, but they do not know how. They go to a college, are told by peers that they are smart, get some good grades, proceed to a graduate degree in journalism, and get hired as analysts. Now they are experts, ready to take on Putin and the Iranian Ayatollahs at age 30.
That is not the road to expertise in tough dealing. The alternate road is that, along the way, maybe you get forced into some street fights. Sometimes the other guy wins, and sometimes you beat the intestines out of him. Then you deal with grown-ups as you mature, and you learn that people can be nasty, often after they smile and speak softly. You get cheated a few times, played. And you learn. Maybe you become an attorney litigating multi-million-dollar case matters. Say what you will about attorneys, but those years — not the years in law school, not the years drafting legal memoranda, but the years of meeting face-to-face and confronting opposing counsel — those years can teach a great deal. They can teach how to transition from sweet, gentle, diplomatic negotiating to tough negotiating. At some point, with enough tough-nosed experience, you figure out Trump’s “The Art of the Deal” yourself.
Trump’s voters get him because not only is he we, but we are he. We were not snowflaked-for-life by effete professors who themselves never had negotiated tough life-or-death serious deals. Instead we live in the real world, and we know how that works. Not based on social science theories, not based on “conceptual negotiating models.” But based on the people we have met over life and always will hate. That worst boss we ever had. The coworker who tried to sabotage us. We know the sons of bums whom we survived, the dastardly types who are out there, and we learned from those experiences how to deal with them. We won’t have John Kerry soothe us by having James Taylor sing “You’ve Got a Friend” carols.
The Bushes got us into all kinds of messes. The first one killed the economic miracle that Reagan had fashioned. The second one screwed up the Middle East, where Iraq and Iran beautifully were engaged in killing each other for years, and he got us mired into the middle of the muddle. Clinton was too busy with Monica Lewinsky to protect us from Osama bin Laden when we had him in our sights. Hillary gave us Benghazi and more. And Obama and Kerry gave us the Iran Deal, ISIS run amok, America in retreat. All to the daily praise of a media who now attack Trump every minute of every day.
So let us understand a few things:
Negotiating with NATO:
NATO is our friend. They also rip off America. They have been ripping us off forever. We saved their butts — before there even was a NATO — in World War I. They messed up, and 116,456 Americans had to die to save their butts. Then they messed up again for the next two decades because West Europeans are effete and so obsessed with their class manners and their rules of savoir faire and their socialist welfare states and their early retirements that they did not have the character to stand up to Hitler in the 1930s. Peace in our time. So they messed up, and we had to save their butts again. And another 405,399 Americans died for them during World War II. And then we had to rebuild them! And we had to station our boys in Germany and all over their blood-stained continent. So, hey, we love those guys. We love NATO.
And yet they still rip us off. We pay 4% of our gigantic gross domestic product to protect them, and they will not pay a lousy 2% of their GDP towards their own defense. Is there a culture more penny-pinching-cheap-and-stingy than the fine constituents of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization? These cheap baseborn prigs will not pay their fare. They are too cheap. They expect America to send boys to die for them in one world war, then another — hundreds of thousands — and then to pay for their NATO defense even a century later.
And then they have the temerity to cheat us further in trade. Long before Trump, they set up tariffs against us for so many things. If the average American knew how badly Europe has been ripping us off for decades with their tariffs, no one in this country would buy anything European again. We would say, as a matter of self-respect and personal pride, “I no longer will buy anything but American, no matter what it costs.”
Every American President has complained about the cheating and imbalance — the NATO penny-pinching-cheapness, the tariff and trade imbalances. In more recent years, the various Bushes complained about it. Even Obama complained about it. But they all did it so gently, so diplomatically. They would deliver the sermon, just as the pastor predictably tells the church-goers on Sunday morning that he is against sin, and the Europeans would sit quietly and nod their heads — nodding from sleeping, not from agreeing — and then they would go back out and sin some more. Another four years of America being suckered and snookered. All they had to do was give Obama a Nobel Peace Prize his ninth month in office and let Kerry ride his bike around Paris.
So Trump did what any effective negotiator would do: he took note of past approaches to NATO and their failures, and correctly determined that the only way to get these penny-pinching-cheap baseborn prigs to pay their freight would be to bulldoze right into their faces, stare them right in their glazed eyes with cameras rolling, and tell them point-blank the equivalent of: “You are the cheapest penny-pinching, miserly, stingy, tightwadded skinflints ever. And it is going to stop on my watch. Whatever it takes from my end, you selfish, curmudgeonly cheap prigs, you are going to pay your fair share. I am not being diplomatic. I am being All-Business: either you start to pay or, wow, are you in for some surprises! And you know what you read in the Fake News: I am crazy! I am out of control! So, lemme see. I know: We will go to trade war! How do you like that? Maybe we even will pull all our troops out of Europe. Hmmm. Yeah, maybe. Why not? Sounds good. Well, let’s see.”
So Trump stuffed it into their quiche-and-schnitzel ingesting faces. And he convinced them — thanks to America’s Seedier Media who are the real secret to the “Legend That is Trump” — that he just might be crazy enough to go to trade war and to pull American boys home. They knew that Clinton and Bush x 2 and Kerry and Hillary and Nobel Laureate Obama never would do it. But they also know that Trump just might. And if they think they are going to find comfort and moderating in his new advisers, John Bolton and Mike Pompeo, alongside him….
Nuh-uh.
So CNN and the Washington Post and all the Seedier Media attacked Trump for days: He is destroying the alliance! He attacks our friends!
Baloney. Obama was the one whom the Left Echo Chamber… Chamber… Chamber never called out for attacking our friends — Israel, Britain, so many others — while cozying up to Hugo Chavez, bowing to dictators, and dancing the tango for Raul Castro. Trump is just the opposite: He knows who the friends are, and he wants to maintain and strengthen those friendships. It is no different from a parent telling a 35-year-old son: “I have been supporting you for thirty-five years. I put you through college by signing four years and $100,000 in PLUS Loans. You graduated college fifteen years ago. For fifteen years I have been asking you nicely to look for a job and to start contributing. Instead, you sit home all day playing video games, texting your friends on a smartphone I pay for, and picking little fuzz balls out of your navel. So, look, I love you. You are my flesh and blood. But if you are not employed and earning a paycheck — and contributing to the cost of this household — in six months, we are throwing you out of the house.” That boy is NATO. Trump is Dad. And all of us have been signing for the PLUS Loans.
Negotiating with Putin
Putin is a bad guy. A really bad guy. He is better than Lenin. Better than Stalin, Khrushchev, Kosygin, Brezhnev, Pol Pot, Mao. But he is a really bad guy.
Here’s the thing: Putin is a dictator. He answers to no one. He does whatever he wants. If there arises an opponent, that guy dies. Maybe the opponent gets poked with a poisoned umbrella. Maybe he gets shot on the street. Maybe the opponent is forced to watch Susan Rice interviews telling the world that Benghazi happened because of a YouTube video seen by nine derelicts in Berkeley and that Bowe Berghdal served with honor and distinction. But, one way or another, the opponent dies.
Trump knows this about Putin. And here is what that means:
If you insult Putin in public, like by telling the newsmedia just before or after meeting with him that he is the Butcher of Crimea, and he messed with our elections, and is an overall jerk — then you will get nothing behind closed doors from Putin. Putin will decide “To heck with you, and to heck with the relationship we just forged.” Putin will get even, will take intense personal revenge, even if it is bad for Russia — even if it is bad for Putin. Because there are no institutional reins on him.
But if you go in public and tell everyone that Putin is a nice guy (y’know, just like Kim Jong Un) and that Putin intensely maintains that he did not mess with elections — not sweet little Putey Wutey (even though he obviously did) — then you next can maintain the momentum established beforehand in the private room. You can proceed to remind Putin what you told him privately: that this garbage has to stop — or else. That if he messes in Syria, we will do “X.” If he messes with our Iran boycott, we will do “Y.” We will generate so much oil from hydraulic fracturing and from ANWR and from all our sources that we will glut the market — if not tomorrow, then a year from now. We will send even more lethal offensive military weapons to Ukraine. We can restore the promised shield to Eastern Europe that Obama withdrew. And even if we cannot mess with Russian elections (because they have no elections), they do have computers — and, so help us, we will mess with their technology in a way they cannot imagine. Trump knows from his advisers what we can do. If he sweet-talks Putin in public — just Putin on the Ritz — then everything that Trump has told Putin privately can be reinforced with action, and he even can wedge concessions because, against that background, Putin knows that no one will believe that he made any concessions. Everyone is set to believe that Putin is getting whatever he wants, that Trump understands nothing. So, in that setting, Putin can make concessions and still save face.
That is why Trump talks about him that way. And that is the only possible way to do it when negotiating with a tyrant who has no checks and balances on him. If you embarrass the tyrant publicly, then the tyrant never will make concessions because he will fear that people will say he was intimidated and backed down. And that he never will do. Meanwhile, Trump has expelled 60 Russians from America, reversed Obama policy and sent lethal weapons to Ukraine, and is pressing Germany severely on its pipeline project with Russia.
The Bottom Line
At the end of the day, Donald Trump is over seventy years old. He has made many mistakes in his life. He still makes some. He is human. But Trump likewise has spent three score and a dozen years learning. He has seen some of his businesses go bankrupt, and he has learned from those experiences to be a billionaire and not let it happen again. No doubt that he has been fooled, outsmarted in years past. And he has learned from life.
He is a tough and smart negotiator. He sizes up his opponent, and he knows that the approach that works best for one is not the same as for another. It does not matter what he says publicly about his negotiating opponent. What matters is what results months later. In his first eighteen months in Washington, this man has turned around the American economy, brought us near full employment, reduced the welfare and food stamp lines, wiped out ISIS in Raqqa, moved America’s Israel embassy to Jerusalem, successfully has launched massive deregulation of the economy, has opened oil exploration in ANWR, is rebuilding the military massively, has walked out of the useless Paris Climate Accords that were negotiated by America’s amateurs who always get snookered, canned the disastrous Iran Deal, exited the bogus United Nations Human Rights Council. He has Canada and Mexico convinced he will walk out of NAFTA if they do not pony up, and he has the Europeans convinced he will walk out of NATO if they don’t stop being the cheap and lazy parasitic penny-pinchers they are. He has slashed income taxes, expanded legal protections for college students falsely accused of crimes, has taken real steps to protect religious freedoms and liberties promised in the First Amendment, boldly has taken on the lyme-disease-quality of a legislative mess that he inherited from Reagan-Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama on immigration, and has appointed a steady line of remarkably brilliant conservative federal judges to sit on the district courts, the circuit appellate courts, and the Supreme Court.
What has Anderson Cooper achieved during that period? Jim Acosta or the editorial staffs of the New York Times and Washington Post? They have not even found the courage and strength to stand up to the coworkers and celebrities within their orbits who abuse sexually or psychologically or emotionally. They have no accomplishments to compare to his. Just their effete opinions, all echoing each other, all echoing, echoing, echoing. They gave us eight years of Nobel Peace Laureate Obama negotiating with the ISIS JV team, calming the rise of the oceans, and healing the planet.
We will take Trump negotiating with Putin any day
לעצט פארראכטן דורך פאליק אום מיטוואך יולי 18, 2018 8:52 pm, פארראכטן געווארן 1 מאל.
-
לאלתר לחיים
- שר האלף
- תגובות: 1462
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: זונטאג מארטש 18, 2012 11:50 pm
-
Goodmorning
- שר חמשת אלפים
- תגובות: 5430
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: דינסטאג מארטש 06, 2018 2:32 pm
-
וויכטיג מאכער
- Site Admin
- תגובות: 32534
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: מיטוואך מארטש 12, 2008 6:21 pm
- לאקאציע: צווישן טרעק 4 און טרעק 5.
Goodmorning האט געשריבן:ביי מיר איז דאס די פראבלעם. ער איז א גוטע סעלפיש דרייקאפ און קען מאכן געלט. וואס נאך קען ער? א לאנד איז נישט קיין ביזנעס.
פאליק האט געשריבן:פאר ווער עס וויל האבן אביסל א טיפערע בליק וואס דא גייט פאר און אביסל ארויסהאבן אונזער ארום הודו זאל אין א רואיגע מינוט אדורכלייעענען דעם ארטיקל
(נישט געאייגנט פאר שטארקע העטערס וואס נעמען זאכן פערזענליך)
-
Goodmorning
- שר חמשת אלפים
- תגובות: 5430
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: דינסטאג מארטש 06, 2018 2:32 pm
פארשער האט געשריבן:Goodmorning האט געשריבן:ביי מיר איז דאס די פראבלעם. ער איז א גוטע סעלפיש דרייקאפ און קען מאכן געלט. וואס נאך קען ער? א לאנד איז נישט קיין ביזנעס.פאליק האט געשריבן:פאר ווער עס וויל האבן אביסל א טיפערע בליק וואס דא גייט פאר און אביסל ארויסהאבן אונזער ארום הודו זאל אין א רואיגע מינוט אדורכלייעענען דעם ארטיקל
(נישט געאייגנט פאר שטארקע העטערס וואס נעמען זאכן פערזענליך)
מיינע קאמענטארן זענען נישט געאייגענט פאר שטארקע קולטיסטן וואס נעמען אן אנדערע מיינונג פערזענליך....
שויתי ה' לנגדי תמיד
-
Goodmorning
- שר חמשת אלפים
- תגובות: 5430
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: דינסטאג מארטש 06, 2018 2:32 pm
Back YahooFINANCE
Trump is making the Clintons look clean
Rick Newman
Rick Newman
Senior Columnist
Yahoo FinanceJuly 18, 2018, 3:33 PM EDT
Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton (L) and former President Bill Clinton at the inauguration ceremony of Donald J. Trump. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton (L) and former President Bill Clinton at the inauguration ceremony of Donald J. Trump. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016 in part because voters perceived his opponent, Hillary Clinton, to be a dishonest, self-dealing phony.
Trump has now pulled off the improbable: He makes Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill look like ethical exemplars, compared with the corruption endemic in Trump’s administration.
Whatever you think of Trump, there was legitimacy to his call, back in 2016, to “drain the swamp” and bring fresh blood to Washington. Team Clinton, it turned out, was the perfect foil for Trump, thanks to Hillary Clinton’s six-figure Wall Street speechmaking, her shifty explanations for violating government policy by using a private email server, and the money flowing into the Clinton Foundation from shady dealmakers undoubtedly hoping for favors once Hillary ascended to the White House.
How quaint those Clinton controversies seem, compared with the Trump presidency.
Trump’s knifing of American law-enforcement agencies, while on a podium at the Helsinki “summit” with American enemy Vladimir Putin, visibly raised the possibility that Trump might sell out his own country to appease a ruthless dictator who at this moment is working to manipulate the upcoming U.S. elections. Trump is now going even further to aid Russian attacks against the United States, by saying Russia is no longer targeting U.S. elections. Intelligence officials contradict Trump and say Russia is still at it. The president of the United States is defending a foreign government that’s attacking the United States. Right now.
Before Trump’s capitulation to Putin, the president deserved the benefit of the doubt from rational observers on the question of Russian aid for his 2016 campaign, because there was no public evidence that Trump knowingly solicited or accepted any Russian help. But Trump’s defense of Putin is now evidence in itself. What does Putin have on Trump that would compel the American president to turn on his own country? Everybody wants to know, as Trump might say.
Self above country
It’s now undeniably clear that Trump puts self above country, self above party and self above voter. Is Trump’s alliance with Putin an act of self-preservation? Is it personal opportunism? Is Trump doing Putin a favor in exchange for return favors? We don’t know, yet, but if there’s a trail of illegal Russian money in the Trump presidential campaign, or in Trump’s far-flung business empire, it’s likely that special prosecutor Robert Mueller knows about it, which means the public will, eventually. It’s now obvious why Trump has been trying for months to torpedo Mueller’s investigation, even though Trump claims to have done nothing wrong: If anybody knows the real reason Trump fawns over Putin, it’s Mueller.
Americans expect politicians to be self-serving. Trump doesn’t disappoint. But if you voted for Trump as a repudiation of Billary-style greasiness, you got duped. Team Trump is abusing its power in ways Hillary Clinton couldn’t even dream of – perhaps even to cover up crimes by the man elected to run it.
Then there are the more routine forms of corruption. Three Trump Cabinet members have resigned, so far, for abusing the perks of office. Former EPA commissioner Scott Pruitt stayed on the job for months after a vast pattern of grifting emerged, as if Trump saw no problem and was simply waiting for the flap to die down. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, meanwhile, has violated government stock-ownership rules meant to prevent top officials from benefiting from their own policy decisions. It might be an honest mistake, but there’s so much mendacity in the Trump administration that it is time to presume guilt rather than innocence.
Boy Wonder Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and White House factotum, has violated government ethics guidelines by retaining ownership in his family’s real-estate company while working for the government. There’s some evidence Kushner’s privately owned company has already enjoyed favored treatment from lenders and other business partners because of Kushner’s newfound access to power. Kushner had no experience in government before Trump became president, and he’s only at the White House because he fulfills Trump’s loyalty requirement. Competence and capabilities are irrelevant.
The Treasury Department just changed disclosure rules for some political groups in a way that will allow more rich donors to contribute anonymously to organizations that lobby for favored candidates and causes. Just what America needs: more opportunities for powerful people, including foreigners, to secretly manipulate U.S. elections. There’s much more, including unqualified companies getting government business because of personal friendships with Trump officials.
Trump has Clintonized the White House, and gone much further. He certainly matches Bill Clinton’s sneaky infidelity, with his porn-star affairs and secret hush payments. Hillary Clinton alienated voters by, among other things, shirking responsibility for her mistakes and rarely taking the blame for anything gone wrong. But she was an amateur compared with Trump, who lies every day, calls his own statements “fake news” and now courts a dictator associated with numerous assassinations. Even the Clinton Foundation, which took money from every opportunist hoping to get an audience with a Clinton, didn’t stoop that low.
This isn’t a defense of Hillary Clinton. She lost the 2016 election because of her own arrogance and mistakes. But it’s time for those who thought they were getting something better, in Trump, to realize they were wrong.
Trump is making the Clintons look clean
Rick Newman
Rick Newman
Senior Columnist
Yahoo FinanceJuly 18, 2018, 3:33 PM EDT
Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton (L) and former President Bill Clinton at the inauguration ceremony of Donald J. Trump. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton (L) and former President Bill Clinton at the inauguration ceremony of Donald J. Trump. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016 in part because voters perceived his opponent, Hillary Clinton, to be a dishonest, self-dealing phony.
Trump has now pulled off the improbable: He makes Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill look like ethical exemplars, compared with the corruption endemic in Trump’s administration.
Whatever you think of Trump, there was legitimacy to his call, back in 2016, to “drain the swamp” and bring fresh blood to Washington. Team Clinton, it turned out, was the perfect foil for Trump, thanks to Hillary Clinton’s six-figure Wall Street speechmaking, her shifty explanations for violating government policy by using a private email server, and the money flowing into the Clinton Foundation from shady dealmakers undoubtedly hoping for favors once Hillary ascended to the White House.
How quaint those Clinton controversies seem, compared with the Trump presidency.
Trump’s knifing of American law-enforcement agencies, while on a podium at the Helsinki “summit” with American enemy Vladimir Putin, visibly raised the possibility that Trump might sell out his own country to appease a ruthless dictator who at this moment is working to manipulate the upcoming U.S. elections. Trump is now going even further to aid Russian attacks against the United States, by saying Russia is no longer targeting U.S. elections. Intelligence officials contradict Trump and say Russia is still at it. The president of the United States is defending a foreign government that’s attacking the United States. Right now.
Before Trump’s capitulation to Putin, the president deserved the benefit of the doubt from rational observers on the question of Russian aid for his 2016 campaign, because there was no public evidence that Trump knowingly solicited or accepted any Russian help. But Trump’s defense of Putin is now evidence in itself. What does Putin have on Trump that would compel the American president to turn on his own country? Everybody wants to know, as Trump might say.
Self above country
It’s now undeniably clear that Trump puts self above country, self above party and self above voter. Is Trump’s alliance with Putin an act of self-preservation? Is it personal opportunism? Is Trump doing Putin a favor in exchange for return favors? We don’t know, yet, but if there’s a trail of illegal Russian money in the Trump presidential campaign, or in Trump’s far-flung business empire, it’s likely that special prosecutor Robert Mueller knows about it, which means the public will, eventually. It’s now obvious why Trump has been trying for months to torpedo Mueller’s investigation, even though Trump claims to have done nothing wrong: If anybody knows the real reason Trump fawns over Putin, it’s Mueller.
Americans expect politicians to be self-serving. Trump doesn’t disappoint. But if you voted for Trump as a repudiation of Billary-style greasiness, you got duped. Team Trump is abusing its power in ways Hillary Clinton couldn’t even dream of – perhaps even to cover up crimes by the man elected to run it.
Then there are the more routine forms of corruption. Three Trump Cabinet members have resigned, so far, for abusing the perks of office. Former EPA commissioner Scott Pruitt stayed on the job for months after a vast pattern of grifting emerged, as if Trump saw no problem and was simply waiting for the flap to die down. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, meanwhile, has violated government stock-ownership rules meant to prevent top officials from benefiting from their own policy decisions. It might be an honest mistake, but there’s so much mendacity in the Trump administration that it is time to presume guilt rather than innocence.
Boy Wonder Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and White House factotum, has violated government ethics guidelines by retaining ownership in his family’s real-estate company while working for the government. There’s some evidence Kushner’s privately owned company has already enjoyed favored treatment from lenders and other business partners because of Kushner’s newfound access to power. Kushner had no experience in government before Trump became president, and he’s only at the White House because he fulfills Trump’s loyalty requirement. Competence and capabilities are irrelevant.
The Treasury Department just changed disclosure rules for some political groups in a way that will allow more rich donors to contribute anonymously to organizations that lobby for favored candidates and causes. Just what America needs: more opportunities for powerful people, including foreigners, to secretly manipulate U.S. elections. There’s much more, including unqualified companies getting government business because of personal friendships with Trump officials.
Trump has Clintonized the White House, and gone much further. He certainly matches Bill Clinton’s sneaky infidelity, with his porn-star affairs and secret hush payments. Hillary Clinton alienated voters by, among other things, shirking responsibility for her mistakes and rarely taking the blame for anything gone wrong. But she was an amateur compared with Trump, who lies every day, calls his own statements “fake news” and now courts a dictator associated with numerous assassinations. Even the Clinton Foundation, which took money from every opportunist hoping to get an audience with a Clinton, didn’t stoop that low.
This isn’t a defense of Hillary Clinton. She lost the 2016 election because of her own arrogance and mistakes. But it’s time for those who thought they were getting something better, in Trump, to realize they were wrong.
שויתי ה' לנגדי תמיד
וויכטיג מאכער האט געשריבן:למעשה איז ער פרעזידענט, און ער גייט רעדן מיט פוטין אויף זיינע טוירמס, גענוי וויזוי ער האלט סיז ריכטיג, און נישט ווי די מידיע און דעמעקראטן ווילן...
ווי קומט אריין די מידיע אין דעמעקראטן, מ'רעט דא פון צוזיין אויף אמעריקאנער זייט צו אויפן רוסישע זייט, אלע ריפבובליקאנער וואס זענען אויפגערעגט זענען אויכט א חלק פין די מידיע?
ביי מיר איז דא איין תירוץ אויף די גאנצע כאאס, ס'האט גארנישט מיט קעלוזען צו טריזעם, ס'פשוט אז די גרויסער שטארקע מעכטיקע טראמפ ווערט שוואך קינדעריש אין נאריש ווען ער הערט א גוט ווארט אויף זיך, ביבי אין פוטין האבן דאס גאר שנעל געכאפט אין טאקע אנגעהויבן באוואסערן אונזער ירום הודו מיט גוטע ווערטער, משא"כ טרודאו אין מעי האבן נישט געכאפט.
ס'האט גארנישט ווערט ס'מיינט די טובה פין זיין אייגענע לאנד, ס'האט אלעס מיט טראמפ גינגאנטישער איגו...
כתמר יפרח האט געשריבן:ביי מיר איז דא איין תירוץ אויף די גאנצע כאאס, ס'האט גארנישט מיט קעלוזען צו טריזעם, ס'פשוט אז די גרויסער שטארקע מעכטיקע טראמפ ווערט שוואך קינדעריש אין נאריש ווען ער הערט א גוט ווארט אויף זיך, ביבי אין פוטין האבן דאס גאר שנעל געכאפט אין טאקע אנגעהויבן באוואסערן אונזער ירום הודו מיט גוטע ווערטער, משא"כ טרודאו אין מעי האבן נישט געכאפט.
ס'האט גארנישט ווערט ס'מיינט די טובה פין זיין אייגענע לאנד, ס'האט אלעס מיט טראמפ גינגאנטישער איגו...
דער כינעזער האט עס אויך געכאפט און ער האט אים געגעבן כבוד מלכים אין כינע ס'האט אבער נאר אויף אזויפיל אויפגעטוען אז ער רעדט צוריק נייס וועגן אים אבער אויף אישוס ווי טרעיד רייסט ער זיך מיט אים. דער פראנצויז האט עס אויך געכאפט און אים באגאסן מיט כבוד (נישט ממש אנפאנג קודם האט ער פראבירט צו דרוקן זיין האנט שטערקער... אבער ער האט שנעל חרטה געהאט און צוריקגעדרייט) און וואס האט ער אויפגעטוען? אז טראמפ האט אים צוריקגעגעבן כבוד! טאריף עקזעמפשאן? נאו וועי! סאו ס'איז דא גרויסע לעכער אין די טעאריע אז אויב מ'חנפ'עט טראמפ ברעכט ער זיך אויף אישוס, אוודאי קומט מען אן בעסער ווי אויב מ'רייסט אים אראפ אבער ער פארגעסט נישט פון זיין ציל צו מאכן אמעריקע נאכאמאל געוואלדיג און "פאלט" נישט אזוי שנעל פאר קיינעם.
-
וויכטיג מאכער
- Site Admin
- תגובות: 32534
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: מיטוואך מארטש 12, 2008 6:21 pm
- לאקאציע: צווישן טרעק 4 און טרעק 5.
כתמר יפרח האט געשריבן:וויכטיג מאכער האט געשריבן:למעשה איז ער פרעזידענט, און ער גייט רעדן מיט פוטין אויף זיינע טוירמס, גענוי וויזוי ער האלט סיז ריכטיג, און נישט ווי די מידיע און דעמעקראטן ווילן...
ווי קומט אריין די מידיע אין דעמעקראטן, מ'רעט דא פון צוזיין אויף אמעריקאנער זייט צו אויפן רוסישע זייט, אלע ריפבובליקאנער וואס זענען אויפגערעגט זענען אויכט א חלק פין די מידיע?
ביי מיר איז דא איין תירוץ אויף די גאנצע כאאס, ס'האט גארנישט מיט קעלוזען צו טריזעם, ס'פשוט אז די גרויסער שטארקע מעכטיקע טראמפ ווערט שוואך קינדעריש אין נאריש ווען ער הערט א גוט ווארט אויף זיך, ביבי אין פוטין האבן דאס גאר שנעל געכאפט אין טאקע אנגעהויבן באוואסערן אונזער ירום הודו מיט גוטע ווערטער, משא"כ טרודאו אין מעי האבן נישט געכאפט.
ס'האט גארנישט ווערט ס'מיינט די טובה פין זיין אייגענע לאנד, ס'האט אלעס מיט טראמפ גינגאנטישער איגו...
דאס איז דיין מיינונג, ווידער מיין מיינונג איז אז טראמפ האט אפגעמאכט אז די גאנצע פארמאלעטי איז קרעפ! מ'מאכט א פרעסע קאנפרענץ ווי כאילו דאס איז עפעס ווער ווייסט וואס... אלעס וואס מ'האט גערעדט ביי די מיטונג גייט מען דא ארויסלייגן, און אפאר דזשורנאליסטן זאלן זיך פיהלן גוט, זיי קענען פרעגן דעם פרעזידענט... סקרו יו! ער האט גענומען די גאנצע מעשה און געמאכט יו"ט! ענק זוכן צו שפרינגן? דא האטעץ! און ווי איינער האט געשריבן, אויב איז געווען די מינדעסטע ספק אז פוטין האט עפעס אויף טראמפ און טראמפ איז זיין פאפעט, איז מער נישטא! די ערשטע זאך וואס טראמפ וואלט געדארפט טוהן איז עס באהאלטן...
-
וויכטיג מאכער
- Site Admin
- תגובות: 32534
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: מיטוואך מארטש 12, 2008 6:21 pm
- לאקאציע: צווישן טרעק 4 און טרעק 5.
-
וויכטיג מאכער
- Site Admin
- תגובות: 32534
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: מיטוואך מארטש 12, 2008 6:21 pm
- לאקאציע: צווישן טרעק 4 און טרעק 5.
דער געוועזענער פרעזידענט פון דזשארדזשיע שרייבט זיין מיינונג איבער די טראמפ פוטין סאמיט...
http://thefederalist.com/2018/07/18/jus ... der-words/
אין קורצן זאגט ער אז טראמפ'ס רעדן מאכט די מידיע שטורעמען בעת אבאמא'ס ווערטער נישט... אבער בעיקר די "עקשן" פון אבאמא און טראמפ איז הימל און ערד... בעת אבאמא האט געלאזט פוטין טוהן וואס ער האט געוואלט, און נישט געלאזט פארקויפן קיין וואפן פאר אוקריינע טראץ די שטיצע פון קאנגרעסס דערפאר, און אבאמא האט געשיקט א קלארע מעסידזש פאר פוטין מיטן זאגן אז סינישטא קיין מיליטערישע סעלושן דערפאר... "אנשטאטס שיקן אנטי טאנק וואפן האט ער געשיקט דאכענעס מיט עסן פאר די געליטענע"... די איינציגסטע זאך וואס אבאמא האט געטוהן איז געווען אין 2016 ווען ער האט געלייגט אביסעלע סאנקציעס און ארויסגעווארפן דיפלאמאטן, "צו ווייניג צו שפעט" זאגט ער... איך האב גאווארענט יארן אבאמא אז רוסלאנד מעדדלט אין אונזער עלעקשן, און גארניש...
ווידער טראמפ, ער פארקויפט וואפן פאר לענדער זיך צו באשיצן פון רוסלאנד, ער רעדט אפשר נישט אזוי שיין בנוגע קריימיע אבער ער טוט! און טראמפ האט ארויסגעלייגט סאך שטערקערע און ברייטערע סאנקציעס אויף רוסלאנד, און טראמפ ארבייט אפצושוואכן רוסלאנד'ס עקאנעמי מיטן אונטערהאקן זייער אויך עקספארטס...
עכ"פ ברענגט ער ארויס אז טראמפ'ס עקשנס און אבאמא'ס עקשנס רעדן העכער ווי וואס זיי האבן געזאגט...
http://thefederalist.com/2018/07/18/jus ... der-words/
אין קורצן זאגט ער אז טראמפ'ס רעדן מאכט די מידיע שטורעמען בעת אבאמא'ס ווערטער נישט... אבער בעיקר די "עקשן" פון אבאמא און טראמפ איז הימל און ערד... בעת אבאמא האט געלאזט פוטין טוהן וואס ער האט געוואלט, און נישט געלאזט פארקויפן קיין וואפן פאר אוקריינע טראץ די שטיצע פון קאנגרעסס דערפאר, און אבאמא האט געשיקט א קלארע מעסידזש פאר פוטין מיטן זאגן אז סינישטא קיין מיליטערישע סעלושן דערפאר... "אנשטאטס שיקן אנטי טאנק וואפן האט ער געשיקט דאכענעס מיט עסן פאר די געליטענע"... די איינציגסטע זאך וואס אבאמא האט געטוהן איז געווען אין 2016 ווען ער האט געלייגט אביסעלע סאנקציעס און ארויסגעווארפן דיפלאמאטן, "צו ווייניג צו שפעט" זאגט ער... איך האב גאווארענט יארן אבאמא אז רוסלאנד מעדדלט אין אונזער עלעקשן, און גארניש...
ווידער טראמפ, ער פארקויפט וואפן פאר לענדער זיך צו באשיצן פון רוסלאנד, ער רעדט אפשר נישט אזוי שיין בנוגע קריימיע אבער ער טוט! און טראמפ האט ארויסגעלייגט סאך שטערקערע און ברייטערע סאנקציעס אויף רוסלאנד, און טראמפ ארבייט אפצושוואכן רוסלאנד'ס עקאנעמי מיטן אונטערהאקן זייער אויך עקספארטס...
עכ"פ ברענגט ער ארויס אז טראמפ'ס עקשנס און אבאמא'ס עקשנס רעדן העכער ווי וואס זיי האבן געזאגט...
-
טשאדעלע באדעלע
- שר תשעת אלפים
- תגובות: 9090
- זיך איינגעשריבן אום: זונטאג יולי 09, 2017 5:29 pm
- לאקאציע: לי עוועניו קארנער מאנסי בלוד.
@וויכי. בנוגע מעדעלינג. אבאמא אליין האט און פאקט אויך אווי ראזענשטיין/קאומי מיט קלארע ווערטער אוועקגעמאכט די 2016 ראשע מעדעלינג, (פראפאגאנדע קאמפיין) אלטס נערישקייטן און אז ס׳איז אום נעריש צוזאגן אז ס׳האט באמת באאיינפלוסט די וואלן.
זעע דא די עקסטשענש מיט ריפארטער׳ס פארלאפענעם דעסעסבער 2016.
טענקס @שמאטע
viewtopic.php?p=1718778#p1718778
און און דע חלק מעדעלינג האט שוין ראזענשטיין קאנקלאדעט אז ס׳איז נישט געווען קיין קאלאזשען.
יעצט האט אבער טראמפ אינטערגענומען א שריט צו האלטן פוטין אקאונטעבל דערויף, ער באשילדיגט אז אבאמא האט ׳געפעילד׳ צו אינטערנעמען שריט קעגן רוסלאנד אויף דעם. פערסאנעלני האלט איך אז ס׳איז ממש אמת, ווייל א נערישע פראפאגאנדע קאמפיין פאר עלעקשענס איז נישט עפעס וואס מיז אריינרעדן אונעם דיפלאמאטישע חלק פון צווישן אזאלכע צוויי לענדער. און פאקט, ווי עטליכע קאנגרעסלייט און אזוי אויך סענעטאר ראנד פאול האט שוין מודה געווען אז ווען ס׳קומט פאר וואלן און אנדערע לענדער טוט אמעריקא די זעלבע זאך. סתם פראפאגאנדע איז נישט עפעס א אויסערגעוועדליך. מד״י האט אויך ״געמעדעלט״ און 2016, אזוי אויך און 2012 ווען זיי האבן ארויסגעלייגט עדס לטובת ראמני. אא״וו. ובפרט ווען ס׳שפילט נישט קיין ראלע און די אויסגאנג. ופשוט הוא
דא קומט אבער אריין די כח פון די מידיע. ווען די מידיע פיקן ווען נישט אויף די קלעים פון קלינטאן׳ס פארלוסט אז די מעדעלינג איז שילדיג, ווען זיי דרייען ווען נישט אזוי איבער און גרינדען ווען נישט די ראשע מעדעלינג ראשע מעדעלינג אישו וואלט אפילו טראמפ נישט געזאגט פאר פוטין דאס וואס ער האט געזאגט פאר CBS נעכטן. די מעדעלינג איז געווארן אזא אישו אז ס׳האט פאקטיש געשלאגן ווארצל׳ן. די יעצטיגע אנטי ראשע מעדעלינג צוגאנג וואס גייט (אויב ס׳גייט טאקע) ווערן אינטערגענומען איז אבסעלוטלי צו פארדאנקען די מידיע!
די דעמעקרעטס און זייערע סופערפעק׳ס די מידיע האבן אבער נישט אקאמפלישט דאס וואס זיי האבן געוואלט!, די ציל מיט די קוועסטשינס ביים סאמיט איז געווען צו גריל׳ן טראמפ צו עגריען די מעדעלינג אויף די DNC העקינג חלק אז ס׳איז געווען ראשע. און דאס איז עפעס וואס טראמפ גייט קיינמאל נישט איינגיין מסכים צו זיין (הגם ס׳מאכט סענס אז ס׳איז טאקע געווען רוסלאנד) ווילאנג די סערווער׳ס וועלן נישט זיין אפן פאר אינוועסטיגעטער׳ס!. ער וויל מיט דעם ארויספוינטן דאס וואס ער זאגט אלטס איבער אז די גאנצע שרייען ראשע ראשע איז בלויז א עקסקיאז אויפן פארלירן די עלעקשן!.. און דאס אז זיי ווילן נישט איבערגעבן די סערווערס פראווט עס!.
יעצט נאכן סאמיט, קומט טראמפ צוריק קיין אמעריקא און נעמצעך ארויסקעשן דעם גאנצן אקאונט!. יא די ראשע׳נס האבן געמעדעלט (פראפאגאנדע) און אז ער האלט פוטין אקאנטעבל!. און אז אבאמא האט פארפעילט עס אפצוהאלטן!.
יעצט פארשטייסטע שוין פארוואס עפעס פונקט נאך טראמפ׳ס אינטערוויא נעכטן נאכט האט די ני יארק טיימס אפירגעקומען מיט א ברעיקינג @יש ברירה באם-שעל איבער די די ענ סי העקינג!?.. זיי האבן זיך געכאפט אז זיי פארלירן דעם קאמף מיטן פרעזידענט!.. ער האט אזוי שיין אנגעלייקט די מעדעלינג אויף די נערישע פראפאגאנדע קאמפיין, ער באשילדיגט גאר אבאמא אויך.. סעעד!
זעע דא די עקסטשענש מיט ריפארטער׳ס פארלאפענעם דעסעסבער 2016.
טענקס @שמאטע
viewtopic.php?p=1718778#p1718778
און און דע חלק מעדעלינג האט שוין ראזענשטיין קאנקלאדעט אז ס׳איז נישט געווען קיין קאלאזשען.
יעצט האט אבער טראמפ אינטערגענומען א שריט צו האלטן פוטין אקאונטעבל דערויף, ער באשילדיגט אז אבאמא האט ׳געפעילד׳ צו אינטערנעמען שריט קעגן רוסלאנד אויף דעם. פערסאנעלני האלט איך אז ס׳איז ממש אמת, ווייל א נערישע פראפאגאנדע קאמפיין פאר עלעקשענס איז נישט עפעס וואס מיז אריינרעדן אונעם דיפלאמאטישע חלק פון צווישן אזאלכע צוויי לענדער. און פאקט, ווי עטליכע קאנגרעסלייט און אזוי אויך סענעטאר ראנד פאול האט שוין מודה געווען אז ווען ס׳קומט פאר וואלן און אנדערע לענדער טוט אמעריקא די זעלבע זאך. סתם פראפאגאנדע איז נישט עפעס א אויסערגעוועדליך. מד״י האט אויך ״געמעדעלט״ און 2016, אזוי אויך און 2012 ווען זיי האבן ארויסגעלייגט עדס לטובת ראמני. אא״וו. ובפרט ווען ס׳שפילט נישט קיין ראלע און די אויסגאנג. ופשוט הוא
דא קומט אבער אריין די כח פון די מידיע. ווען די מידיע פיקן ווען נישט אויף די קלעים פון קלינטאן׳ס פארלוסט אז די מעדעלינג איז שילדיג, ווען זיי דרייען ווען נישט אזוי איבער און גרינדען ווען נישט די ראשע מעדעלינג ראשע מעדעלינג אישו וואלט אפילו טראמפ נישט געזאגט פאר פוטין דאס וואס ער האט געזאגט פאר CBS נעכטן. די מעדעלינג איז געווארן אזא אישו אז ס׳האט פאקטיש געשלאגן ווארצל׳ן. די יעצטיגע אנטי ראשע מעדעלינג צוגאנג וואס גייט (אויב ס׳גייט טאקע) ווערן אינטערגענומען איז אבסעלוטלי צו פארדאנקען די מידיע!
די דעמעקרעטס און זייערע סופערפעק׳ס די מידיע האבן אבער נישט אקאמפלישט דאס וואס זיי האבן געוואלט!, די ציל מיט די קוועסטשינס ביים סאמיט איז געווען צו גריל׳ן טראמפ צו עגריען די מעדעלינג אויף די DNC העקינג חלק אז ס׳איז געווען ראשע. און דאס איז עפעס וואס טראמפ גייט קיינמאל נישט איינגיין מסכים צו זיין (הגם ס׳מאכט סענס אז ס׳איז טאקע געווען רוסלאנד) ווילאנג די סערווער׳ס וועלן נישט זיין אפן פאר אינוועסטיגעטער׳ס!. ער וויל מיט דעם ארויספוינטן דאס וואס ער זאגט אלטס איבער אז די גאנצע שרייען ראשע ראשע איז בלויז א עקסקיאז אויפן פארלירן די עלעקשן!.. און דאס אז זיי ווילן נישט איבערגעבן די סערווערס פראווט עס!.
יעצט נאכן סאמיט, קומט טראמפ צוריק קיין אמעריקא און נעמצעך ארויסקעשן דעם גאנצן אקאונט!. יא די ראשע׳נס האבן געמעדעלט (פראפאגאנדע) און אז ער האלט פוטין אקאנטעבל!. און אז אבאמא האט פארפעילט עס אפצוהאלטן!.
יעצט פארשטייסטע שוין פארוואס עפעס פונקט נאך טראמפ׳ס אינטערוויא נעכטן נאכט האט די ני יארק טיימס אפירגעקומען מיט א ברעיקינג @יש ברירה באם-שעל איבער די די ענ סי העקינג!?.. זיי האבן זיך געכאפט אז זיי פארלירן דעם קאמף מיטן פרעזידענט!.. ער האט אזוי שיין אנגעלייקט די מעדעלינג אויף די נערישע פראפאגאנדע קאמפיין, ער באשילדיגט גאר אבאמא אויך.. סעעד!
לעצט פארראכטן דורך טשאדעלע באדעלע אום דאנערשטאג יולי 19, 2018 1:10 pm, פארראכטן געווארן 1 מאל.
רשעות קאלטע סעלצער
