Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

אבינו מלכנו מנע מגיפה מנחלתך - אלעס ארום די קאראנא וויירוס

די אחראים: אחראי, געלעגער

אוועטאר
מחשב
שר שלשת אלפים
תגובות: 3408
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג יולי 17, 2018 3:57 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך מחשב » מאנטאג אוגוסט 24, 2020 6:26 pm

נו אהער דערמיט...

אוועטאר
פאטאקי08
שר עשרת אלפים
תגובות: 11852
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דאנארשטאג אוגוסט 09, 2007 1:30 pm
לאקאציע: בקרוב אין וואשינגטאן

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך פאטאקי08 » מאנטאג אוגוסט 24, 2020 6:32 pm

אידישע לוח
גמטריא קאלקולעיטאר
send any zip code to 845-209-2361 and get the ZMANIM for today

אוועטאר
מחשב
שר שלשת אלפים
תגובות: 3408
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג יולי 17, 2018 3:57 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך מחשב » מאנטאג אוגוסט 24, 2020 6:35 pm

א דאנק!

קאנטרי
שר מאה
תגובות: 208
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג סעפטעמבער 02, 2019 9:45 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך קאנטרי » מאנטאג אוגוסט 24, 2020 6:41 pm

1080x360.jpeg
1080x360.jpeg (56.51 KiB) געזעהן 2108 מאל

אוועטאר
מחשב
שר שלשת אלפים
תגובות: 3408
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג יולי 17, 2018 3:57 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך מחשב » מאנטאג אוגוסט 24, 2020 7:02 pm

פאטאקי08 האט געשריבן:דא
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vwb1gde03aqpq ... o.mp4?dl=0

ער הערט זיך זייער פארביטערט. ער גייט אריין אין אביסעלע קאנספעראציע טעאריעס.

(אבער אליבא דאמת בינעך נישט זיכער אז ער איז נישט גערעכט, עכ"פ אויף אזויפיל אז ס'איז מעגליך אז זיין פראטאקאל וואלט געקענט ראטעווען מענטשן, נאר די מענטשן וואס דארפן דאס איבערקוקן האבן משום איזה סיבה [גערעכט אדער נישט גערעכט] נישט גענומען די ערנסקייט עס צו שטודירן.)

באריכט
שר מאה
תגובות: 246
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג אוקטובער 09, 2018 11:41 am

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך באריכט » מאנטאג אוגוסט 24, 2020 9:24 pm

יואל שרייבער האט געשריבן:אויף סי ען ען זאגן זיי אפיציעל אז היידראקסי האט זיך "ארויסגעשטעלט צו זיין שעדליך", איינער ווייסט אויף וואס זיי בויען.


זיי בויען א קעיס קעגען טראמפ...

קאנטרי
שר מאה
תגובות: 208
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג סעפטעמבער 02, 2019 9:45 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך קאנטרי » דאנארשטאג אוגוסט 27, 2020 10:09 am

Zelenko Covid-19 Prophylaxis Protocol.pdf
(76.55 KiB) דאונלאודעד 78 מאל


Prehospital Management of Covid-19
Zelenko Protocol
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko

קאנטרי
שר מאה
תגובות: 208
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג סעפטעמבער 02, 2019 9:45 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך קאנטרי » דאנארשטאג אוגוסט 27, 2020 10:26 am

Dr. Zev Zelenko
@zev_dr
·
2h
Covid and the drug that dare not speak its name.
http://cooltv.se/video/covid-and-the-dr ... s-name-ctv

#solidtango

אוועטאר
בבקשה
שר האלף
תגובות: 1369
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דאנארשטאג יוני 25, 2020 11:42 am

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך בבקשה » דאנארשטאג אוגוסט 27, 2020 10:32 am

קאנטרי האט געשריבן:
Zelenko Covid-19 Prophylaxis Protocol.pdf


Prehospital Management of Covid-19
Zelenko Protocol
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko


אינטרעסאנט אז ער האט אפגעלאזט אזיטרימייסען, האט ער געגעבן א סיבה דערפאר? אדער סתם געדראפט און פארטיג?

אוועטאר
בוחר בשירי זמרה
שר האלף
תגובות: 1862
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דינסטאג ינואר 26, 2016 10:49 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך בוחר בשירי זמרה » דאנארשטאג אוגוסט 27, 2020 10:45 am

:lol:
באריכט האט געשריבן:
יואל שרייבער האט געשריבן:אויף סי ען ען זאגן זיי אפיציעל אז היידראקסי האט זיך "ארויסגעשטעלט צו זיין שעדליך", איינער ווייסט אויף וואס זיי בויען.


זיי בויען א קעיס קעגען טראמפ...

קאנטרי
שר מאה
תגובות: 208
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג סעפטעמבער 02, 2019 9:45 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך קאנטרי » דאנארשטאג אוגוסט 27, 2020 11:18 am

https://wiba.iheart.com/featured/vicki- ... narrative/

אדיו פון דר. הארווי ריטש

חדשות
שר האלף
תגובות: 1226
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג דעצמבער 05, 2016 5:11 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך חדשות » פרייטאג אוגוסט 28, 2020 1:27 pm

פון א לעצטערע אינטערוויו פון דרץ הארווי ריש, שטארקע ווערטער. ציעט א פאראלעל צו אן עידס מעדיצין 33 יאר צוריק וואס פאוטשי האט אויפגעהאלטען פאר 2 יאר און טויזענטער זענען געשטארבן לכבוד דעם.


In fact, the science is so one-sided in supporting this result that it’s stronger than anything else I’ve ever studied in my entire career. The evidence in favor of hydroxychloroquine benefit in high-risk patients treated early as outpatients is stronger than anything else I’ve ever studied.”

Risch goes on to recall that Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has resolutely denied any benefit from hydroxychloroquine, was similarly obstructionist (the similarity is almost eerie) in 1987, in the face of the AIDS epidemic.

At that time, there was a drug (Bactrim) that worked better than AZT and was very inexpensive, and which had an excellent record of treating the particular kind of pneumonia that was then the leading killer of people with AIDS. But the testimonies of countless frontline AIDS physicians meant nothing to Fauci, who opposed the scientific consensus and discouraged its use. As many as 17,000 people died unnecessarily. You need to hear Dr. Risch — who is a mild-mannered academic — tell the story.

Incidentally, if the organized LGBT movement weren’t in the tank for the Democrats, they’d be screaming with outrage right now, alerting Americans that Fauci is today doing to COVID patients what he had done to AIDS patients in 1987. But they’d rather stick it to Trump than stand up for themselves and for suffering Americans.

חדשות
שר האלף
תגובות: 1226
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג דעצמבער 05, 2016 5:11 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך חדשות » פרייטאג אוגוסט 28, 2020 1:58 pm

ivermectin האט די זעלבע נעבעכדיגע גורל ווי HQC מיקס. נאך נישטא קיין ריזאלטס פון קיין איין FDA אפראווד רענדאמייזד קליניקעל טרייעל, בשעת עס איז דא א בארג פון עווידענס וואס איז פאזיטיוו, ווי אויך הונדערטער דאקטוירים וואס האבן געזען גוטע ריזאלטאטן.

דאס איז די וויכטיגסטע קוואט פונעם ארטיקל ווי דער הונט ליגט באגראבן... פון פראפעסער ראטשער וואס האט אליין אנגעפירט מיט א קליניקעל טרייעל "מיט קאנטראל ארעם" און האט געזען גאר גוטע רעזולטאטען אפילו ביי קראנקערע פאציענטען.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... qus_thread

Rajter said he initially used ivermectin as a "measure of desperation." But now that he has seen positive results in his hospital network, he is frustrated by an intentionally slow review process.

Certain drugs are expedited by the FDA, while "other treatments which have been shown to be quite effective -- like ivermectin -- have not seen the light of day
," Rajter said.


---

Positive findings from another study in India are also being evaluated by the country's medical review board, The Print reported. In Australia, a widely known gastroenterologist who repurposes drugs, Thomas Borody, MD, PhD, director of the Centre for Digestive Diseases in Sydney, Australia, endorsed ivermectin as one part of a triple-drug therapy, along with doxycycline and zinc, for outpatient COVID-19 cases.

"Ivermectin has been used in billions of prescriptions to date, and even with high dosing there are very few side effects when used for things like scabies," Borody told MedPage Today. "This thing in combination of the three works so well, I believe it is the way we should go."

A Call for More Research

While ICU physicians may see ivermectin as something worth trying, others believe the evidence is still too scant.

The drug should not be written off, but neither is it ready for widespread clinical use, Chaccour said. For example, it is still unclear whether it is safe to use in the context of a highly inflammatory syndrome, like COVID-19, or in combination with other drugs, he said.

Rajter said he initially used ivermectin as a "measure of desperation." But now that he has seen positive results in his hospital network, he is frustrated by an intentionally slow review process.

Certain drugs are expedited by the FDA, while "other treatments which have been shown to be quite effective -- like ivermectin -- have not seen the light of day," Rajter said.

Currently, there are more than 30 clinical trials testing ivermectin for COVID-19. Bisoffi is investigating high doses of ivermectin for mild infection and Chaccour is also conducting a trial in Spain. A team at Johns Hopkins University is comparing ivermectin versus bicalutamide and usual care among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Whether ivermectin passes the test in a randomized controlled setting remains to be seen, but scientists seem to agree that ivermectin warrants at least that.

"It's a shame that so few randomized controlled trials have been performed in the U.S. on potential treatments such as this one," Spinelli said.

חדשות
שר האלף
תגובות: 1226
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג דעצמבער 05, 2016 5:11 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך חדשות » פרייטאג אוגוסט 28, 2020 5:50 pm


חדשות
שר האלף
תגובות: 1226
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג דעצמבער 05, 2016 5:11 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך חדשות » פרייטאג אוגוסט 28, 2020 6:39 pm

דאס איז נייעס. NIH מאכט צום ערשטען מאל מאכט א חילוק פון פאציענטען אין האספיטאל און די וואס זענען אינדרויסן פון האספיטאל צו HQC העלפט.
https://www.patientcareonline.com/view/ ... n-new-data

קאנטרי
שר מאה
תגובות: 208
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג סעפטעמבער 02, 2019 9:45 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך קאנטרי » מיטוואך סעפטעמבער 02, 2020 9:27 am

הרב זעלענקא האט א נייע קאנפערענץ מיט איינעם אין אסטראליא 9/1 נעכטן

חדשות
שר האלף
תגובות: 1226
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג דעצמבער 05, 2016 5:11 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך חדשות » מיטוואך סעפטעמבער 02, 2020 11:06 am

קאנטרי האט געשריבן:הרב זעלענקא האט א נייע קאנפערענץ מיט איינעם אין אסטראליא 9/1 נעכטן

לינק/דראפבאקס ביטע

אוועטאר
סטיטשינער
שר עשרת אלפים
תגובות: 14068
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דאנארשטאג ינואר 05, 2017 3:49 pm
לאקאציע: 50°18′N 21°4′E

תגובהדורך סטיטשינער » פרייטאג סעפטעמבער 25, 2020 3:43 pm

והעיקר, די מיני הערות זענען מיינע גרינע, דהיינו איך האב געליינט, און איך האב עס אפי' אפגעלערנט


איך בין א יוד
שר מאה
תגובות: 238
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג פאברואר 01, 2016 2:01 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך איך בין א יוד » מוצ"ש סעפטעמבער 26, 2020 11:43 pm

כלכך נכון.

"אם מסכות היו עוזרות, היו אוסרים עליהם כמו היידרוקסי".
https://amzn.to/2EQ3DqT


Shop Amazon - Create an Amazon Baby Registry
https://amzn.to/30dV8x4

איך בין א יוד
שר מאה
תגובות: 238
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג פאברואר 01, 2016 2:01 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך איך בין א יוד » מאנטאג אוקטובער 05, 2020 4:51 pm

The indictment of Anthony Fauci for his Big Lie

By Joel S. Hirschhorn

With a grand jury approach, the revealing of evidence herein shows that Dr. Anthony Fauci has deliberately ignored massive amounts of data showing that hydroxychloroquine is a safe, cheap and effective remedy for COVID-19. By ignoring his ethical responsibility as a physician to first do no harm, his behavior continues to cause preventable pain, suffering and death. Evidence also vindicates what President Trump said and did early on to inform Americans about the benefits of hydroxychloroquine.

1. The Case

Mounting COVID-19 cases and deaths result from limitations on physicians using a safe, effective and low-cost treatment medicine. This, despite many studies and data from other countries showing that HCQ really works to lower death rates and keep affected people from needing hospitalizations and expensive care.

Missing from discussions of hydroxychloroquine use is explicit acknowledgment that Anthony Fauci has used his considerable power and influence to block use of the drug and prevent physicians from using their best judgment. The media have failed to connect two death-causing actions: 1. Some state governors forcing nursing homes to accept virus-infected elderly people; and 2. Government preventing wide and early use of HCQ.

TRENDING: Hollywood star Dominic West says Trump COVID news made him 'leap in the air with joy'

2. Reluctance to condemn Fauci

Nearly everyone seems afraid to openly condemn Fauci's behavior and demand a reversal of his position on HCQ, which would also impact CDC and FDA.

He has made himself the king of virus medicine through constant media appearances far beyond what is normal for a medical researcher. He is part of is a research organization, not a public health or drug approval agency. As much a tyrant as a virus expert, Fauci has stubbornly refused to admit his mistake. We need public outrage against a leftist, media collusion that allows one man to block a lifesaving medicine.

In this vein, an Australian government official has recently condemned the ban on using HCQ: "Health bureaucrats have 'violated the very first principle of the Hippocratic oath' which is to 'do no harm.' … and they must lift their bans. Otherwise they are engaged in crimes against humanity, and they should be taken to the criminal court in The Hague."

Is Dr. Anthony Fauci culpable for COVID deaths?
Yes No
Enter your email

Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Some Americans blame President Trump for the high levels of cases, hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19. But they have more reason to blame Fauci and his pandemic of lies about HCQ. At the end of this article is a "political" solution. It could make stockpiled HCQ broadly available.

3. The Evidence

As in a grand jury, this article cites many publications and detailed information demonstrating the proper and effective use of HCQ that has already saved millions of lives worldwide in this pandemic and could save millions more.

In sum, evidence shows that HCQ should be taken very early, either at home in the first few days after a positive test or after symptoms deemed signficant by a physician, or in the first days of hospitalization. Also, evidence shows that HCQ should be taken along with zinc and an antibiotic, such as doxycycline. Such a "cocktail" can stop the virus at its earliest stage before the very severe second stage.

The Economic Standard's new white paper argues that "HCQ has met the appropriate burden of proof and urges members of the U.S. news media, public health community, and regulatory agencies to stop politicizing the use of this medicine. … opponents have deprived many tens of thousands of Americans of a potentially life-saving treatment." But like other reports, the critical role of Fauci in blocking broad use of HCQ is missing.

A just released Italian study of 3,451 hospitalized patients found 30% less mortality, better than that reported for the very costly remdesivir in hospitals, touted by Fauci. An earlier, smaller Italian study found a 66% reduction in death in hospital patients. A Belgium study of 8,075 hospitalized patients found a 65% reduction. Likewise, a recent study from Saudi Arabia found 43% fewer hospitalizations and 45% fewer ICU admissions. For high-risk nursing home patients in Spain HCQ cut the risk of a bad outcome in half.

A large Henry Ford Hospital System study found a mortality rate for 2,541 patients of 13.5% for HCQ alone, 20.1% for HCQ plus azithromycin, and 26.4% for neither.

A new analysis by R. Clinton Ohlers is title, "Effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine was hiding in plain sight." An early widely publicized study concluded that HCQ was not effective in New York patients. In truth: "Survival rates for hospitalized patients who received the drug approached 85%" and "with azithromycin the survival rate rose as high as 90%." Without either drug, "survival fell to levels as low as 53%." Conclusion: "a highly effective, inexpensive, and widely available treatment for COVID-19 is already in hand."

Similarly, Dr. Watanabe from Brazil reanalyzed a Minnesota study that had a negative conclusion. For very early HCQ use, he found that "reduction in symptomatic outcomes is 72% after 0 days (first day of infection), 48.9% after 1 day and 29.3% after 2 days" – all compared to a placebo group. Conclusion: "Infected patients may have a large benefit if treated as early as possible."

Clearly, many media-hyped studies saying HCQ has no benefits are not credible. Some medical journal papers were retracted.

An article by physician Norman Doidge is "Hydroxychloroquine: A Morality Tale – A startling investigation into how a cheap, well-known drug became a political football in the midst of a pandemic." Conclusion: "Worldwide [HCQ] might save a million or more people before COVID is tamed." Some studies were poorly designed. In one case "the patients were given the medication late – on average 16.6 days after the first symptoms."

Another important study is: "Early treatment with hydroxychloroquine: a country-based analysis." Critical conclusion: The death rate from the virus in a number of nations where HCQ has been made widely available (the treatment group) is about 74% less than in those nations, including the U.S., where it has not been made available (the control group).

Many physicians and experts on viruses have published strong pro-HCQ articles, notably Dr. Harvey Risch from Yale University. He has repeatedly argued for using HCQ as the standard outpatient therapy. This article is for a general audience. In a medical journal article, he warned against "sitting by and letting hundreds of thousands die because we did not have the courage to act according to our rational calculations."

Experienced pro-HCQ front-line doctors have appeared on Fox News shows, including Dr. Stephen Smith, Dr, Marc Siegel (whose 96-year-old father was saved with HCQ), Dr. Janette Nesheiwat, Dr. Mehmet Oz and Dr. Risch who noted, "We're basically fighting a propaganda war against the medical facts" and that "75,000 to 100,000 lives will be saved" if the national HCQ stockpile were used. Fox's Sean Hannity had Dr. George Fareed, an early user of HCQ, on a recent radio show.

A new CDC publication reveals prescriptions for HCQ at retail stores (not mail order). In March through June this year there likely were 680,000 prescriptions for treating the virus. After the government clamp down, prescriptions in May and June averaged 80,000 a month. This limited use may help explain many reduced death rates.

And despite negative actions by some governments and the World Health Organization, the Sermo survey of physicians in 30 countries found for this September that HCQ is being used for 22% of patients outside hospitals, 21% inside them and even 14% in ICUs.

4. Problems with Fauci's Positions

Dr. Fauci is only satisfied with randomized control trials (RCTs). This position has been sharply debunked, as has the assertion of negative health effects and that HCQ risks outweigh its benefits.

Thomas R. Frieden, former head of the CDC, concluded in 2017: "Despite their strengths, RCTs have substantial limitations." He supported using many other kinds of data that now constitute the evidence for using HCQ.

Similarly, Norman Doidge observed: "RCT is best understood as standing not for Randomized Control Trials, but rather 'Rigidly Constrained Thinking.' in the current COVID-19 situation … we cannot simply, as so many are insisting [namely Fauci], rely only on the long-awaited RCTs to decide how to treat COVID-19."

Importantly, hundreds of drugs have been approved without RCTs, including hydrocortisone, Lasix, tetanus vaccine, insulin, tetracycline, warfarin, heparin, prednisone, half of chemotherapy drugs used in cancer and uses of HCQ for many diseases, such as malaria and lupus.

Another false criticism has recently been debunked: "HCQ decreases cardiac events. HCQ should not be restricted in COVID-19 patients out of fear of cardiac mortality." Another study concluded: "HCQ administration is safe for a short-term treatment for patients with COVID-19 … causing … no directly attributable arrhythmic deaths." Dr. James Todaro concluded: "It is highly unlikely that fatal cardiac cases are from hydroxychloroquine use. It is far more likely that the disease itself is the cause of arrhythmias and cardiac injury during the hyperinflammation phase of severe cases of COVID-19."

An article by Steven Hatfill, "Why Is The Media Suppressing Information About Hydroxychloroquine's Effectiveness Against COVID?" noted, "There are now 53 studies that show positive results of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 infections." It also highlights the early Fauci and FDA strategy that promoted use of HCQ for hospitalized patients (when it was mostly too late) rather than early outpatient use.

The Doidge article noted that for a major study that found a 66% reduction in hospital deaths from use of HCQ, Fauci "didn't seem excited." The key question: "Why should anyone facing a pandemic wish to discredit potentially lifesaving medications?" The answer: The billions of dollars to be made from selling medications and vaccines. Fauci has had a very close relationship with pharmaceutical companies and has patents for one of the leading vaccines being tested by Moderna.

In August three-front line physicians wrote a detailed open letter to Fauci making the medical case for unblocking widespread use of HCQ. "You are largely unchallenged in terms of your medical opinions. You are the de facto COVID-19 Czar. … Americans must not continue to die unnecessarily. Adults must resume employment and our youth return to school. Locking down America while awaiting an imperfect vaccine has done far more damage to Americans than the coronavirus."

An important article by an epidemiologist rebutted the explanation by Fauci of why he rejects the incredible amount of evidence supporting use of HCQ. Conclusion: "I earnestly hope that Dr. Fauci reconsiders his opposition to HCQ and restores his hitherto considerable reputation."

Schachtel noted, "Mad scientist: Fauci demands total U.S. shutdown until COVID vaccine arrives: There is no basis for Fauci's claim that he can manipulate society into stopping the virus. He is either a victim of the illusion of control, or he has embraced total deception as part of his power drunk campaign to stay in the spotlight."

Dr. Lee D. Merritt unraveled the question of why Fauci has been so negative about HCQ: "Why is he so strongly promoting the $3,600 remdesiver and almost totally ignoring the $20 HCQ regimen, other than to say the latter is of 'unproven benefit'?" Are there conflicts of interest? She noted that Fauci is an integral part of a vaccine coalition, specifically the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP), a collaboration of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Fauci's group. Fauci is also in the Leadership Council of the 'Decade of Vaccines' Council. Large sums of money flow from the Gates Foundation to and around Fauci's projects.

5. Indictment justified

The continued use of crippling lockdowns advocated by Fauci is sheer lunacy when, in fact, we have an effective therapeutic. Early use of HCQ coupled with understanding the low impact of the virus on younger and healthy people would have blocked local and state lockdowns.

Waiting for large-scale use of a proven vaccine to justify restoring our society and economy is just plain stupid. If Fauci were a genuine public health official and not just a medical researcher, then he would have recognized the great many negative health impacts of lockdowns and waiting for a broadly used vaccine. He has not.

In sum: Every single day people are suffering and dying unnecessarily because Fauci refuses to accept HCQ facts. Instead, in endless media statements and appearances he pushes masks, lockdowns and vaccines.

Anthony Fauci benefits from incorrect views of HCQ in the mostly leftist press. From The Washington Post: "There is no solid scientific evidence hydroxychloroquine should be used to treat COVID-19." Similarly, Twitter recently issued a warning "about the potential risks" of HCQ use. USA Today claimed science "has shown [HCQ] does not have a clinical benefit for COVID-19 patients and even has increased risks."

6. Indictment specifics

For this grand jury proceeding, substantial evidence supports the indictment of Fauci on these counts:

A. Violating his physician oath to first do no harm.

B. Using his substantial influence to block widespread use of the proven safe, cheap and effective HCQ and, consequently, causing preventable pain, suffering and death for many thousands of Americans directly and through crippling lockdowns with their own negative health impacts.

C. Blocking traditional medical freedom and preventing physicians from using their best judgment in selecting for their patients the best treatment for COVID-19.

7. Solution

As a form of trial for the indicted Fauci, here is a practical way to defeat anti-HCQ efforts and the leftist, anti-Trump media and, more importantly, help Americans.

Immediately create a special work group under the White House Pandemic Task Force. Have it co-chaired by Dr. Scott Atlas, now a member of the Task Force, and the eminent Dr. Harvey Risch of Yale University. Have them select 10 additional members. Mandate them to deliver to the Task Force and President Trump within 30 days a recommendation to remove government restrictions on the use of HCQ or maintain the status quo. Let truth prevail.
https://amzn.to/2EQ3DqT


Shop Amazon - Create an Amazon Baby Registry
https://amzn.to/30dV8x4

איך בין א יוד
שר מאה
תגובות: 238
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג פאברואר 01, 2016 2:01 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך איך בין א יוד » מאנטאג אוקטובער 05, 2020 4:55 pm

The indictment of Anthony Fauci for his Big Lie
צוגעלייגטע
zal.JPG
zal.JPG (62.63 KiB) געזעהן 816 מאל
https://amzn.to/2EQ3DqT


Shop Amazon - Create an Amazon Baby Registry
https://amzn.to/30dV8x4

אוועטאר
סטיטשינער
שר עשרת אלפים
תגובות: 14068
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דאנארשטאג ינואר 05, 2017 3:49 pm
לאקאציע: 50°18′N 21°4′E

תגובהדורך סטיטשינער » מאנטאג אוקטובער 05, 2020 5:02 pm

מאדנע ביז גאר אז צווישען אלע נייע אומבאקאנטע טריעטמענטס וואס טראמפ באקומט, באקומט ער נישט HCQ. קום מיך נישט זאגן אז די ליבעראלער זענען שילדיג דערין.
והעיקר, די מיני הערות זענען מיינע גרינע, דהיינו איך האב געליינט, און איך האב עס אפי' אפגעלערנט


אוועטאר
בבקשה
שר האלף
תגובות: 1369
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: דאנארשטאג יוני 25, 2020 11:42 am

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך בבקשה » מאנטאג אוקטובער 05, 2020 5:23 pm

Dr. Fauci is only satisfied with randomized control trials (RCTs). This position has been sharply debunked, as has the assertion of negative health effects and that HCQ risks outweigh its benefits.


בקיצור ער נעמט אן די פאזיציע וואס רוב נארמאלע דאקטוירים נעמען אן. פארדעם באטיטלט מען עם אלץ ליגנער.

פאלעסיידס
שר האלפיים
תגובות: 2058
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג נובעמבער 25, 2019 5:28 pm

Re: Hydroxychloroquine רפואה פאר COVID-19

תגובהדורך פאלעסיידס » מאנטאג אוקטובער 05, 2020 6:03 pm

איך בין א יוד האט געשריבן:The indictment of Anthony Fauci for his Big Lie

וויאזוי וואלט ביידען געזאגט אויף דר זאלענקא? מען, קאלד יו זשאסט שאט...

שליו ודגים
שר האלף
תגובות: 1525
זיך איינגעשריבען אום: מאנטאג מאי 29, 2017 11:00 am

Re:

תגובהדורך שליו ודגים » מאנטאג אוקטובער 05, 2020 6:05 pm

סטיטשינער האט געשריבן:מאדנע ביז גאר אז צווישען אלע נייע אומבאקאנטע טריעטמענטס וואס טראמפ באקומט, באקומט ער נישט HCQ. קום מיך נישט זאגן אז די ליבעראלער זענען שילדיג דערין.


אפשר איז דא בעסערע טריטמענטס ווי דעם
קיינער האט נישט געזאגט אז היידראקסי וואס האט אין פאקט געהאלפן הונדערטער מענטשן איז די איינציגסטע און בעסטע


צוריק צו “קאראנא וויירוס”

ווער איז אונליין

באנוצערס וואס דרייען זיך דא: נישטא קיין איינגעשריבענע באנוצערס און 3 געסט